.NET 1.1 and 2.0 on same development machine

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

jlotmar - 19 Jan 2006 19:26 GMT

As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same machine
at the same time. Can anyone verify that this is correct and there are no
problems related to having both framework versions installed simultaneously?
This is a development machine used for web and windows based applications in
VB.Net & C#.

Thanks for any comments...

Signature

Jonathan

Reply to this Message

Kevin Spencer - 19 Jan 2006 23:11 GMT

Yes, this is true. I have been running both on the same machine for about a
year now.

Signature

HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
.Net Developer
Who is Mighty Abbott?
A twin turret scalawag.

> As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same
> machine
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thanks for any comments...

Reply to this Message

Shez - 20 Jan 2006 00:28 GMT

I just updated to 2.0 from 1.1 (on XP Pro SP2) and Outlook with the Business
Contact Manager caused Outlook to quit working completely. Only option was
to uninstall 2.0 framework. If anyone else has this experience (and fixed
it) please post solution

> As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same
> machine
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thanks for any comments...

Reply to this Message

Jim Wooley - 20 Jan 2006 03:36 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "jlotmar" <jlotmar@discussions.microsoft.com>

> As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same
> machine
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> in
> VB.Net & C#.

I have been running 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 (including beta versions) for some time
now without problems. I was even able to uninstall 2.0 betas without 1.0 or
1.1 breaking. The only thing you need to watch for is IIS, making sure it is
using the right framework version in each directory.

Jim Wooley

Reply to this Message

.NET 1.1 and 2.0 on same development machine

Free Magazines