Nothing is certain. However, all of the information from Microsoft, all of
the anecdotal information I've heard, and my own experience indicate no
issues.

Signature
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
.Net Developer
There's a seeker born every minute.
- Dr. "Happy" Harry Cox
> Thanks. Just to be sure - how safe is it? Can I be sure of no DLL Hell
> issues? Absolutely sure?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> >
>> > Thanks!
so if I understand well, it is possible to install framework 1.1 and
framework 2.0 side by side?
Thanks
> Nothing is certain. However, all of the information from Microsoft, all of
> the anecdotal information I've heard, and my own experience indicate no
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
Andrew Robinson - 13 Nov 2005 17:56 GMT
yes,
Most machines will have 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 frameworks installed on them. They
play nice with eachother.
-A
> so if I understand well, it is possible to install framework 1.1 and
> framework 2.0 side by side?
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks!
Kevin Spencer - 14 Nov 2005 00:54 GMT
I have several applications and services running on a server, written for
both platforms, and running on both platforms, all without issue. So yes, it
seems to work as advertised. :)

Signature
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
.Net Developer
There's a seeker born every minute.
- Dr. "Happy" Harry Cox
> so if I understand well, it is possible to install framework 1.1 and
> framework 2.0 side by side?
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks!
Itayb - 23 Jan 2006 09:02 GMT
Do any of you have a document from micrsoft indicating that there is no
problem installing both of them ?
> I have several applications and services running on a server, written for
> both platforms, and running on both platforms, all without issue. So yes, it
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks!
pvdg42 - 23 Jan 2006 12:55 GMT
> Do any of you have a document from micrsoft indicating that there is no
> problem installing both of them ?
I doubt you'll find any definitive statement to that effect. Why? Because
installing new software in any environment always carries risks and
Microsoft cannot know what software each of us has installed on each
machine, much less the hardware configuration. Nobody can *guarantee* that
your experience will be problem free and Microsoft would be foolish to do
so.
That said, the overwhelming majority posting here and in other .NET groups
appears to have no difficulties installing/using both Visual Studios on the
same PC. I include myself in that group (five different PC's with different
hardware/software configurations in my office and home, plus 40 PC's in
classrooms and labs requiring both versions for different classes).
You *should* have no issues.

Signature
Peter [MVP Visual Developer]
Jack of all trades, master of none.