Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Versions of .NET runtime

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
O.L. - 10 Aug 2005 14:23 GMT
Hello,

I've installed the .NET framework v2.0 beta 2 on my computer, but when
I try to install SharpDevelop or other softwares, I still get a message
"You must have .NET framework v1.1" ...
Does someone know why ? Can't the 2.0 runtime execute 1.1 apps ?

Thank you :)
Olivier

Signature

Ceci est une signature automatique de MesNews.
Site : http://mesnews.no-ip.com

Chris - 10 Aug 2005 14:34 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thank you :)
> Olivier

No, you need 1.1 to run 1.1 apps.

Chris
O.L. - 10 Aug 2005 16:05 GMT
Chris a formulé la demande :
>> Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Chris

Thank you :-|

But why isn't there any ascendant compatibility ?
All the apps compiled with 1.1 ... won't work when users download 2.0
runtime ? :-o

O.L.

Signature

Ceci est une signature automatique de MesNews.
Site : http://mesnews.no-ip.com

Lloyd Dupont - 10 Aug 2005 16:29 GMT
oops... for some reason you didn't get my answer!
so I copy it again!

I'm sorry to disagree with previous poster but 2.0 could execute 1.1 apps.
MS seems to agree with me on that as well:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnnetdep/html/n
etfxcompat.asp


Anyway, the issue with #develop is that the installer (and the application
itself) specifically look for the version 1.1 of the runtime

Signature

If you're in a war, instead of throwing a hand grenade at the enemy, throw
one of those small pumpkins. Maybe it'll make everyone think how stupid war
is, and while they are thinking, you can throw a real grenade at them.
Jack Handey.

> Chris a formulé la demande :
>>> Hello,
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> O.L.
O.L. - 10 Aug 2005 16:24 GMT
Après mure réflexion, Chris a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Chris

Found on
http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Microsoft_NET_Framework/1016688677/1

"Anyone know if 1.1 code will run on framework 2.0? I'm hesitant to
continue developing on 1.1 if I know I'll have issues running my apps
on a 2.0 platform..."
"Yes, 1.1 code will run on 2.0, but not the other way around. In fact,
1.1 code runs better on version 2.0 than it did on version 1.1."

Signature

Ceci est une signature automatique de MesNews.
Site : http://mesnews.no-ip.com

Lloyd Dupont - 10 Aug 2005 14:52 GMT
I'm sorry to disagree with previous poster but 2.0 could execute 1.1 apps.
MS seems to agree with me on that as well:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnnetdep/html/n
etfxcompat.asp


Anyway, the issue with #develop is that the installer (and the application
itself) specifically look for the version 1.1 of the runtime

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.