Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ASP to .Net migration project

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jean-Marc Pugin - 16 Dec 2004 12:22 GMT


Hi,

Do you consider CSHARP as THE language to be used for an ASP to .Net
migration project.

ASP .Net seems a "natural" choice but as .Net is "language neutral"
and CSHARP is positioned as THE native language
we are requesting some help/advice.

Many Thanks.
Anushi - 22 Dec 2004 09:51 GMT
Hi Jean,

You need to first study a bit about the migration process.
".NET" is platform independent, as the compiler produces an intermediate
language which is later converted to the machine's native code.
And if I am getting you right, "language neutral" would mean that a
class/module written in one .NET language can be used in an application
written in another .NET language.

For making web applications in .NET, you would anyways need any of the .NET
programming languages, either VB.NET or C#.

Please look here for details on the ASP to ASP.NET migration.

http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/upgrade/asp.aspx

HTH,
Anushi

Hi,
Do you consider CSHARP as THE language to be used for an ASP to .Net
migration project.
ASP .Net seems a "natural" choice but as .Net is "language neutral"
and CSHARP is positioned as THE native language
we are requesting some help/advice.
Many Thanks.
Olaf Baeyens - 24 Dec 2004 13:19 GMT
> For making web applications in .NET, you would anyways need any of the .NET
> programming languages, either VB.NET or C#.

I would say go for the C# because it is a language build up from scratch for
.NET and does not have the burden of backwards compatibility. Also it is
very easy to learn and use. Compiles lightning fast too.

Signature

http://www.skyscan.be

Olaf Baeyens - 24 Dec 2004 13:20 GMT
> I would say go for the C# because it is a language build up from scratch for
> .NET and does not have the burden of backwards compatibility. Also it is
> very easy to learn and use. Compiles lightning fast too.

And to add, it is unlikely that VB.NET would be perted to Mac and Linux, but
C# already exist for Linux, check out "Mono".

Signature

http://www.skyscan.be


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.