> The JetBrains profiler, DotTrace,is actually pretty good ...

Signature
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u
>> The JetBrains profiler, DotTrace,is actually pretty good ...
>
>Does it support ILX, i.e. other .NET languages?
Indeed. Profilers don't deal with the program source code itself, but
rather with the compiled executable or class library.
Thus it does not matter what .NET language the application was written
with.
Although having said that having the source code is always good
because you can better analyze the profiler results and establish
problematic code or methods.
I wrote a short tutorial you can take a look at:
http://thinkersroom.com/bytes/2007/10/01/profiling-net-applications-i/
--
http://bytes.thinkersroom.com
Jon Harrop - 18 Oct 2007 14:59 GMT
>>Does it support ILX, i.e. other .NET languages?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thus it does not matter what .NET language the application was written
> with.
That is not true of the ANTS profiler by RedGate software, which breaks on
the tail calls (ILX) generated by the F# compiler. I'd like to know if the
same is true of the profiler you cited.

Signature
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u
Rad [Visual C# MVP] - 19 Oct 2007 11:11 GMT
>>>Does it support ILX, i.e. other .NET languages?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>the tail calls (ILX) generated by the F# compiler. I'd like to know if the
>same is true of the profiler you cited.
Really? Wow. I didn't know that.
Hmm.
Let me investigate DotTrace and see whether it trips up as well.
--
http://bytes.thinkersroom.com