> I have a class library containing a Windows form. I create a dll from
> this project and use it in my application like so:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> any other way and still be able to fully use dotfuscator. I do I have
> to settle for less protection?
I will assume that when mode library the obfuscator keeps
public names.
Maybe you could change more names to internal.
Else you could look for an obfuscator that allows you to
list names to exclude from obfuscation.
Arne
hagipro@gmail.com - 09 Sep 2007 17:05 GMT
On 8 sep, 18:57, Arne Vajh?j <a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> mart...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > I have a class library containing a Windows form. I create a dll from
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Arne
Hi Arne,
Thank you for your help. I will look at changing names to internal.
And I also thought about making a
seperate class where I would put all the "sensitive" coding. If I
reference the class from the "form class"
I could totally obfuscate that class yet leave the class with the form
untouched (library mode).
Martin.