> Thanks for the reply.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> DJ
> Well, that was his point - that the SSL handshake is what is taking up all
> the
> time.
Yes, but Fiddler wouldn't be able to help me with that because it doesn't
support HTTPS, as far as I can see, or am I incorrect?
> You might consider employing some sort of message-level authentication if
> you can, and dispense with the SSL. Or, you can encrypt at the message
> level
> and also dispense with the HTTPS protocol.
OK, that's an interesting thought I hadn't even considered. Thanks very
much.
Hans Kesting - 03 Sep 2007 13:20 GMT
> Yes, but Fiddler wouldn't be able to help me with that because it
> doesn't support HTTPS, as far as I can see, or am I incorrect?
Fiddler2 does
http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/
Hans Kesting
David Jackson - 03 Sep 2007 13:36 GMT
>> Yes, but Fiddler wouldn't be able to help me with that because it
>> doesn't support HTTPS, as far as I can see, or am I incorrect?
>
> Fiddler2 does
>
> http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/
Thanks for that, and apologies to Peter...