> "A nested class could work as well, and might make more sense."
> You're right, that would work and would make a little more sense as I
> could comment it well in the context of the containing class.
> Still.... I'd like to find another way if possible that didn't require an
> additional abstraction of the data from it's logical layer.
Ahh, but a lazy initialization scheme is a detail that ought to be hidden
behind encapsulation.
> Thanks for the suggestion, it's my number one option as of this moment :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve
sklett - 10 Jun 2007 08:53 GMT
>> "A nested class could work as well, and might make more sense."
>> You're right, that would work and would make a little more sense as I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Ahh, but a lazy initialization scheme is a detail that ought to be hidden
> behind encapsulation.
Yes, right you are! ;0)
>> Thanks for the suggestion, it's my number one option as of this moment :)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Steve