Kron,

   Have you tried it and compiled it?

public string Name {get; set;}

   The above will not work.  The compiler expects an implementation to the
property.

public abstract string Name {get; set;}

   The above will work.  It will require derived classes to override the
implementation.

   If you want to provide a default implementation which can be overriden,
then you can use virtual:

public virtual string Name
{
   get
   {
       return name;
   }
   set
   {
       name = value;
   }
}

   Hope this helps.