Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / Languages / C# / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Beginner design question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul - 19 Dec 2005 18:15 GMT
Hi,

I'm curious how others would deal with something I'm building.
The app itself is a form of diary; it allows the organisation of diary
entries and a number of other data types.
Each diary entry is listed under its title, and double clicking brings
up the full entry and options for editing.
Each entry and associated option is stored in a diary object instance.
I'm wondering how best to store the persistent data. One option is
to a file on the users HDD. Each time the app is opened the file is
read and all diary instances are recreated. But I'm worried that
storing every diary instance in memory will create an ever increasing
memory footprint.
The other option I've thought of is creating a db file on the users
HDD, and only reading what information is needed. For example, when a
list of diary entries is shown, just the title fields are read into
memory. On double clicking a title, the entire record is fetched and an
instance of diary object created.

Which one of these would be the best solution? Or is there something
else more suited?

Another quick question: Are there any pre-made controls for the
richtextbox control? E.g. bold, italic, font type, colour buttons etc?
Or do all have to be created?

Any help would be appreciated!

Paul
Bruce Wood - 19 Dec 2005 18:29 GMT
Is this for personal / local use, or intended for a wider audience?

If this is for personal use, or use amongst friends, keep in mind that
most computers these days have enormous amounts of memory. It would
take one heck of a prodigious and dedicated writer to fill up 512 Mb,
IMHO.

That said, if this is intended as a commercial product then you have to
be pickier about resource usage.

In the former case, the quick-n-dirty solution is to simply place the
entries in an XML file. When you start the app, read the XML into
memory, add an edit entries, then write it out again when your app
exits (or do intermediate saves to guard against data loss on crashes).

However, if this is to be a "real" application, you really do need to
use a database. MS just came out with SQL Server Express, which I
believe is a freely-distributable mini version of SQL Server for the
desktop. This would be ideal. You could also use an Access database,
but personally I think that Access isn't long for this world, so I
wouldn't recommend that.

A database would certainly make for a longer-lived, better-functioning
application. The XML solution is just a quicky.

If you really wanted to be clever, you could design yourself a data
layer interface something like this:

public interface IDiaryDataLayer
{
   DiaryEntrySummaryCollection GetSummaries();

   DiaryEntry GetEntryDetails(DiaryEntrySummary entry);

   void InsertEntry(DiartyEntry entry);

   void UpdateEntry(DiaryEntry entry);
}

...and any other methods or properties you'll need from your data
layer. Then you could write the XML data layer:

public class DiaryXmlStorage : IDiaryDataLayer
...

in order to test your application, then, later, you could work on the
database layer:

public class DiaryDataBaseStorage : IDiaryDataLayer

and just plug it in in place of the XML data layer. In fact, you could
write any class you wanted and so long as it implemented
IDiaryDataLayer, your diary application could use it to store and
retrieve diary entries.
Michael S - 20 Dec 2005 14:47 GMT
> desktop. This would be ideal. You could also use an Access database,
> but personally I think that Access isn't long for this world, so I
> wouldn't recommend that.

Note that MsAccess is also a stripped SQL Server internally.
But it requires a Office license and so I agree. SQL Express 2005 is a great
chioce.

- Michael S

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.