 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / .NET Framework / Component Services / December 2003COM+ C# newbie....
I have a class that has the COM+ attributes to make it an object pool and transactional, I have strong-named the DLL and all the DLL's that it uses. I have used regsvcs.exe to register it in the COM+ catalog, I can see it in the catalog but..... When I use it from a web service I get the following error when attempting to create the object in the web service 'The ServicedComponent being invoked is not correctly configured (Use RegSvcs to re-register).' I am using framework 1.1 with Windows 2000 Server SP3 Any Ideas? Cheers Ollie Ollie, Do you have any code in your COM+ component that requires certain user rights? Is the component configured correctly to be used by the ASPNET user that ASP.NET is running your page under (most likely, if you haven't changed the defaults). If you have been able to call this component in a console or windows forms app, then it is most likely a rights issue with the ASPNET user. Hope this helps.  Signature- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] > I have a class that has the COM+ attributes to make it an object pool and > transactional, I have strong-named the DLL and all the DLL's that it uses. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Ollie Nick, I have it running in a normal asp.net, I am trying to move some business logic to an 'out of process' server so I thought I would try to get it to run in the local COM+ catalog first... Cheers Ollie > Ollie, > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > > > Ollie > .... all the DLL's that it uses. Are they registered in GAC ? Gawel yes all the DLL it uses are in the GAC, does it have to be in the GAC as well? Ollie > > .... all the DLL's that it uses. > Are they registered in GAC ? > > Gawel > yes all the DLL it uses are in the GAC, does it have to be in the GAC as > well? Yes, the serviced DLL should be in the GAC as well. Or at least a copy of it should be in the website's bin\ directory. How else would it find it? Try first to use it from a console program. > I have a class that has the COM+ attributes to make it an object pool and > transactional, I have strong-named the DLL and all the DLL's that it uses. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Ollie cheers willy, I am trying it in a coneoloe app now and it works.... But where would I put application config values that I normally put the in the application.config file for a COM+ component? I have tried putting them in the xml config fiel for my test harness but it is not reading the values ? Any one have any ideas? Cheers Ollie > Try first to use it from a console program. > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > > > Ollie Ollie, If it works in a console app and not an ASP.NET app, then you need to configure the user in the web.config file for where the page resides (you can impersonate a user for that directory, for example). Or, you can imitate a user through code (look at the documentation for the Impersonate method on the WindowsIdentity class for an example of how to do this). Also, you could also set the security of the COM+ component so that it allows all users to execute it (don't make it run in the context of the currently logged in user, especially if this is running in IIS). Hope this helps. Signature- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] > cheers willy, I am trying it in a coneoloe app now and it works.... > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > > > > > Ollie cheers Nick.... How can I use the app config setting that used to be stored in the web.config xml file for the ASP.Net web service? Cheers Ollie > Ollie, > [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > > > > > > > Ollie Forget about this for a moment and return to your asp.net page and try to run this in aspcomp mode. > cheers willy, I am trying it in a coneoloe app now and it works.... > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > > > > > Ollie thanks willy, Got it working in the asp.net app, I used set the following attribute [assembly: ApplicationAccessControl(false)] for the security options, I presume this allows anonymous access to the COM+ component, Which is the best to secure access to the COM+ component? Cheers Ollie > Forget about this for a moment and return to your asp.net page and try to > run this in aspcomp mode. [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > > > > > > > Ollie Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.