.NET Forum / .NET Framework / Compact Framework / February 2008
Did CF3.5 run om WM2003SE ?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Rainer - 02 Jan 2008 23:16 GMT happy new Year,
Yes, this is the question: Did CF3.5 run om WM2003SE ? thanks for competent answers bye Rainer Borchmann
Rainer - 02 Jan 2008 23:37 GMT "Rainer" <newsgroups_spam@t-online.de> schrieb > Did CF3.5 run om WM2003SE ?
> thanks for competent answers From me to me : YES
i found it on the Requirements on the CF Sites in the microsoft world.
Bye
Simon Hart [MVP] - 03 Jan 2008 16:45 GMT The CF 3.5 is supported on the following platforms:
Windows Mobile 2003 for Pocket PC. Windows Mobile 2003 for Pocket PC SE. Windows Mobile 5.0 for Pocket PC. Windows Mobile 6.0 for Pocket PC. Windows Mobile 5.0 for Smartphone. Windows Mobile 6.0 for Smartphone. Windows Embedded CE 6.0.
 Signature Simon Hart Visual Developer - Device Application Development MVP http://simonrhart.blogspot.com
> "Rainer" <newsgroups_spam@t-online.de> schrieb > Did CF3.5 run om WM2003SE ? > > thanks for competent answers [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Bye John Roberts - 03 Jan 2008 22:41 GMT Not Windows CE 5.0?
Plus do you know when the Windows CE QFE might be released?
Thanks, - John
> The CF 3.5 is supported on the following platforms: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Windows Mobile 6.0 for Smartphone. > Windows Embedded CE 6.0. Simon Hart [MVP] - 04 Jan 2008 12:02 GMT No, CE 5.0 is not supported by the CF 3.5.
See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html
 Signature Simon Hart Visual Developer - Device Application Development MVP http://simonrhart.blogspot.com
> Not Windows CE 5.0? > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Windows Mobile 6.0 for Smartphone. > > Windows Embedded CE 6.0. John Roberts - 04 Jan 2008 19:53 GMT That's a major disappointment for us :-(
> No, CE 5.0 is not supported by the CF 3.5. > > See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html Simon Hart [MVP] - 04 Jan 2008 23:41 GMT It is very disappointing. I will try to find out the reasons why. Seems upgrading to CE 6.0 is the only answer if you wish to make use of CF 3.5.
 Signature Simon Hart Visual Developer - Device Application Development MVP http://simonrhart.blogspot.com
> That's a major disappointment for us :-( > > > No, CE 5.0 is not supported by the CF 3.5. > > > > See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: > > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html Robert Wachtel - 07 Jan 2008 09:26 GMT The download page of redistributable CF 3.5 tells another story:
Supported Device Operating Systems: Windows Mobile Software for Pocket PC 2003, Windows Mobile 5.0 for PocketPC and Smartphone, Windows CE .NET 5.0 and higher.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e3821449-3c6b-42f1-9fd9 -0041345b3385&displaylang=en
Robert
 Signature http://blog.robertsoft.de
> It is very disappointing. I will try to find out the reasons why. Seems > upgrading to CE 6.0 is the only answer if you wish to make use of CF 3.5. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> > See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: >> > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html Paul G. Tobey [eMVP] - 07 Jan 2008 15:16 GMT Odd, considering that there's no such thing as "Windows CE .NET 5.0"...
Paul T.
The download page of redistributable CF 3.5 tells another story:
Supported Device Operating Systems: Windows Mobile Software for Pocket PC 2003, Windows Mobile 5.0 for PocketPC and Smartphone, Windows CE .NET 5.0 and higher.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e3821449-3c6b-42f1-9fd9 -0041345b3385&displaylang=en
Robert
 Signature http://blog.robertsoft.de
"Simon Hart [MVP]" <srhartone@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:E1541EA3-478C-4282-82E5-F23C91F6760A@microsoft.com...
> It is very disappointing. I will try to find out the reasons why. Seems > upgrading to CE 6.0 is the only answer if you wish to make use of CF 3.5. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> > See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: >> > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html Robert Wachtel - 07 Jan 2008 15:29 GMT ;) Tell it Microsoft. A Google search on microsoft.com gives about 39 results for "windows ce .net 5.0" including a platform builder update...
http://www.google.de/search?as_q=&as_epq=windows+ce+.net+5.0&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&c r=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=.microsoft. com
Robert
 Signature http://blog.robertsoft.de
> Odd, considering that there's no such thing as "Windows CE .NET 5.0"... > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >>> > See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: >>> > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html Paul G. Tobey [eMVP] - 07 Jan 2008 16:48 GMT Yea, I know. Name changes don't always get through to everyone. Maybe you can ask on the .NET CF blog and the Microsoft guys can make clear what it is that they actually support... I don't have the URL in front of me, but it shouldn't be too hard to find (either in the archives of this group or with a search of the Microsoft or MSDN sites).
Paul T.
;) Tell it Microsoft. A Google search on microsoft.com gives about 39 results for "windows ce .net 5.0" including a platform builder update...
http://www.google.de/search?as_q=&as_epq=windows+ce+.net+5.0&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&c r=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=.microsoft. com
Robert
 Signature http://blog.robertsoft.de
"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" <p space tobey no spam AT no instrument no spam DOT com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:O85C2AUUIHA.476@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Odd, considering that there's no such thing as "Windows CE .NET 5.0"... > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >>> > See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: >>> > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html Robert Wachtel - 07 Jan 2008 16:59 GMT On http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2636831&SiteID=1 Ilya Tumanov (Microsoft) states:
Q: Which versions of the device OS are supported by NETCF 3.5?
A: Windows Mobile 2003 For Pocket PC (both first and second editions), Windows Mobile 5.0 (all flavors), Windows Mobile 6 (all flavors), Windows CE 4.2 (AKA Windows CE .Net), Windows CE 5.0, Windows Embedded CE 6. Windows CE is a customizable OS and must include NETCF V 3.5 dependencies in order to run NETCF V 3.5. Contact your device OEM to find out if particular OS has them.
So it seems even CE 4.2 is supported - great news.
Robert
 Signature http://blog.robertsoft.de
> Yea, I know. Name changes don't always get through to everyone. Maybe you > can ask on the .NET CF blog and the Microsoft guys can make clear what it is [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] >>>> > See here for more information to what is new/supported and what isn't: >>>> > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html John Roberts - 17 Jan 2008 16:58 GMT There is conflicting information here. Is Compact Framework 3.5 supported on Windows CE 5.0?
On the following thread from Microsoft we get: http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2636831&SiteID=1 "Yes"
earlier in this thread we get "No"
Which is correct? TIA, - John
Ginny Caughey [MVP] - 17 Jan 2008 19:35 GMT John,
I would consider Ilya's response on the forum to be definitive, but do note this part of the reply:
"Windows CE is a customizable OS and must include NETCF V 3.5 dependencies in order to run NETCF V 3.5. Contact your device OEM to find out if particular OS has them."
In other words, it can depend on the particular device.
 Signature Ginny Caughey Device Application Development MVP
> There is conflicting information here. Is Compact Framework 3.5 supported > on Windows CE 5.0? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > TIA, > - John Simon Hart [MVP] - 17 Jan 2008 20:40 GMT Hmmm, this is very confusing debate. Here is a list of devices that CF is supported on and CE 5.0 is not listed: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms172550.aspx
 Signature Simon Hart Visual Developer - Device Application Development MVP http://simonrhart.blogspot.com
> John, > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > TIA, > > - John Ginny Caughey [MVP] - 17 Jan 2008 20:52 GMT Simon,
I agree it is confusing. I just trust Ilya, and I don't have a CE 5 device to test this with. ;-)
 Signature Ginny Caughey Device Application Development MVP
> Hmmm, this is very confusing debate. Here is a list of devices that CF is > supported on and CE 5.0 is not listed: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >> > TIA, >> > - John Simon Hart [MVP] - 17 Jan 2008 21:07 GMT I too trust Ilya and I too don't have a CE 5.0 device to test on. I think it might be CE 5.0 Platform Builder (embedded) that is not supported. I think this is worth contacting the CF team to clarify.
 Signature Simon Hart Visual Developer - Device Application Development MVP http://simonrhart.blogspot.com
> Simon, > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > >> > TIA, > >> > - John Ginny Caughey [MVP] - 17 Jan 2008 21:46 GMT Simon,
Also the MSDN page references VS 2008, so deployment might be an issue. Again, I can't really test it so if anybody else can, that would be great.
 Signature Ginny Caughey Device Application Development MVP
>I too trust Ilya and I too don't have a CE 5.0 device to test on. I think >it [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] >> >> > TIA, >> >> > - John John Roberts - 18 Jan 2008 20:04 GMT Ok, so it looks like it is supported but we would need it in a QFE (embedded) to be of any use. I hope MS release a QFE for it for 5.0 and 6.0 soon.
Thanks all... - John
>I too trust Ilya and I too don't have a CE 5.0 device to test on. I think >it > might be CE 5.0 Platform Builder (embedded) that is not supported. I think > this is worth contacting the CF team to clarify. John Roberts - 22 Jan 2008 00:21 GMT I heard from MS tech support that the January 08 QFE should include the CF v3.5...
Cesar - 07 Feb 2008 23:15 GMT Hello people. I want to know if at least CF 2.0 can be installed on a WM2003 for Smartphone. I have a Motorola MPX220 and it only can run CF 1.0 applications. Is there a CF 2.0 release for this version of OS or any tweak to make possible the installation?? I wonder why this version of the framework is available for Pocket PC but not for smartphones :-s.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
César.
---------------------------------------------------------------
On http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2636831&SiteID=1 Ilya Tumanov (Microsoft) states:
Q: Which versions of the device OS are supported by NETCF 3.5?
A: Windows Mobile 2003 For Pocket PC (both first and second editions), Windows Mobile 5.0 (all flavors), Windows Mobile 6 (all flavors), Windows CE 4.2 (AKA Windows CE .Net), Windows CE 5.0, Windows Embedded CE 6. Windows CE is a customizable OS and must include NETCF V 3.5 dependencies in order to run NETCF V 3.5. Contact your device OEM to find out if particular OS has them.
So it seems even CE 4.2 is supported - great news.
Robert
 Signature http://blog.robertsoft.de
"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" <p space tobey no spam AT no instrument no spam DOT com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:uEHWr0UUIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Yea, I know. Name changes don't always get through to everyone. Maybe > you [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] >>>> > isn't: >>>> > http://simonrhart.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-new-for-device-developers-in.html
Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
|
|