Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / Compact Framework / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Platform

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Andrew Robinson - 08 Nov 2007 15:33 GMT
I haven't worked on the CF for about 3 years but now have a client that just
bought a number of WinCE based scanners and now wants me to build some apps
for them. My main question is would they have been better off with Win
Mobile on the same device which was an option.

I remember CE being more difficult to work with. No ActiveSync pass through
(assuming they aren't using 802.11 for connectivity.) But honestly, I don't
know anything about the current state of ActiveSync.

Could someone reply with some general info on the subject. I know that CE
has its place but would Mobile be easier to deal with for this project? (And
I do realize the Mobile is running on top of CE.) What as some of the big
issues when dealing with CE? Etc.

Thanks!

-Andy
Paul G. Tobey [eMVP] - 08 Nov 2007 15:49 GMT
No, not better off.  Windows Mobile has some stuff that is different and
more-advanced than Windows CE.  Windows CE has more things that could be in
it, depending on what the device OEM wanted to put in there.  It just
depends.

You're incorrect about no ActiveSync pass-thru.  That's a Windows CE
function, not specific to Windows Mobile.

The only way to divine which would be better for some given project would be
to know what you have to do for the project...

Paul T.

>I haven't worked on the CF for about 3 years but now have a client that
>just bought a number of WinCE based scanners and now wants me to build some
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> -Andy
Andrew Robinson - 08 Nov 2007 17:30 GMT
Paul,

Thanks for the feedback.

-Andy

> No, not better off.  Windows Mobile has some stuff that is different and
> more-advanced than Windows CE.  Windows CE has more things that could be
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>
>> -Andy
<ctacke/> - 08 Nov 2007 19:21 GMT
Given a choice, I would almost always go the WinCE route insatead of WM
unless the customer needed some WM-specific stuff (like Pocket Outlook,
etc).  It's easier to control the environment in a non-WM device.

Signature

Chris Tacke, eMVP
Join the Embedded Developer Community
http://community.opennetcf.com

>I haven't worked on the CF for about 3 years but now have a client that
>just bought a number of WinCE based scanners and now wants me to build some
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> -Andy
Andrew Robinson - 08 Nov 2007 21:03 GMT
Good points. Thanks again.

Signature

Andrew Robinson
http://www.binaryocean.com

> Given a choice, I would almost always go the WinCE route insatead of WM
> unless the customer needed some WM-specific stuff (like Pocket Outlook,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>> -Andy

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.