Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / CLR / September 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Version Management

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jean-Francois Cantin - 08 Sep 2003 15:32 GMT
Hi ,

we'd like to manage our dll's versions. When we change version in the
assembly file, it looks like if we have to rebuild all dependents files,
even if the modified file still compatible. It seems we have to rebuild all
the dependencies of the modified file, and the dependencies of the
dependencies of the modified file, and so on.

Is that the solution ?!
We don't use the GAC's functionalities, we leave all DLL in the principal
application folder.

Thanks

Jeff
Vince Henderson - 09 Sep 2003 22:31 GMT
Check out using an application config file to redirect your versions if you
don't want to recompile.  The information is in the Framework SDK docs (or
on MSDN).  See the topic marked Assembly Binding Redirection.  That will
give you the information you need to generate a config file.  
This technique is particularly useful during the development cycle, but we
do recommend you do the whole stack recompile before shipping your apps.  
Experience shows this is easier to understand and debug after the product
has been in the wild for a while.

Vince
Signature


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
originated.  

--------------------

| From: "Jean-Francois Cantin" <jeanfrancois.cantin@expertisa.com>
| Subject: Version Management
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
|
| Jeff

Vince
Common Language Runtime

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Phil Wilson - 10 Sep 2003 18:27 GMT
Could use the file version (AssemblyFileVersion) instead of AssemblyVersion for
your management?
Signature

Phil Wilson [MVP Windows Installer]
----

> Hi ,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Jeff
PhallGuy - 22 Sep 2003 01:43 GMT
Hi Jean,

We use an AssemblyFileVerison for minor updates so that we don't have to
rebuild all the dependant assemblies. We have our full policy online that
we've suggested that others use at
http://www.xheo.com/Products/FrameworkCompatibility.aspx

- Paul Alexander

> Hi ,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Jeff

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.