> Kimi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks Andrej, so VS 2005 is OK for framework 2.0, not worth update to
VS 2008 "just because of" these add-ons unless you need it.
Andrej Tozon - 10 Mar 2008 11:17 GMT
Well, it is ok, but you could find Visual Studio 2008 more useful than
2005 even when not dealing with that new stuff. One example is a
dataset designer, where Visual Studio 2008 can generate much better
codebehind code than 2005 - you can part the actual dataset and
datatables in different classes and take advantage of the newly
generated TableAdapterManager class to update all tables in a dataset
at once, in one transaction. If you're developing web projects, Visual
Studio 2008 now offers Javascript intellisense and debugging, better
CSS tools, etc...
In general, Visual Studio 2008 is not just about support for FX
3.0/3.t technologies, it's also about offering better tools and
overall experience when dealing with apps for 2.0.
Andrej
> > Kimi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> - Prikaži navedeno besedilo -
Spam Catcher - 10 Mar 2008 14:10 GMT
kimiraikkonen <kimiraikkonen85@gmail.com> wrote in news:c9a3f660-f493-406a-
b377-a968d56a609d@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> Thanks Andrej, so VS 2005 is OK for framework 2.0, not worth update to
> VS 2008 "just because of" these add-ons unless you need it.
You can think of VS.NET 2008 as a refined version of 2005. It worth an
upgrade if you can get your hands on 2008.

Signature
spamhoneypot@rogers.com (Do not e-mail)