.NET Forum / .NET Framework / ADO.NET / January 2006
ADO.net Code contest
|
|
Thread rating:  |
bdwest - 10 Jan 2006 19:48 GMT I am sponsoring a contest to see if someone can come up with ADO.net code to insert records into a MS Access 2003 database faster than ADODB methods (MS ActiveX Data Object 2.x library). My experiece has shown that I can write records to Access at least 4 times faster using ADODB methods in a Visual Studio 2003/2005 project as compared to any ADO.net methods. I want to see if this is due to my ignorance or a problem with ADO.net and Access 2003 databases.
From the link below, there is a test project available that has five methods of writing to an Access database, an ADODB method and 4 versions of ADO.net methods. The time to write 30,000 records is timed for each method. The code is written in VB.net.
There is a $100 reward to the first person who can use ADO.net methods that beat the ADODB methods working within the confines of the rules. Note there is only one reward.
Please see the following link for full details.
http://www.kelbli.net/kb1/AdoNetContest.html
Thanks
Brian
Jesús López - 10 Jan 2006 21:20 GMT May I use DAO 3.6 instead of ADO.NET or ADODB ?
I think DAO is the fastest way to deal with Access databases.
Regards from Madrid (Spain) Jesús López
VB MVP
bdwest - 10 Jan 2006 21:41 GMT Thanks for your interest. I am specifically interested in ADO.net methods that outperform ADODB, so unfortunately DAO is not allowed.
Thanks
Brian
> May I use DAO 3.6 instead of ADO.NET or ADODB ? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > VB MVP Robbe Morris [C# MVP] - 11 Jan 2006 00:59 GMT You won't find any winners. The poor performance is not because of your ignorance.
And, I too have found DAO to be faster from within .NET than ADODB in .NET via COM Interop.
 Signature Robbe Morris - 2004/2005 Microsoft MVP C# http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forums/merit.asp
> Thanks for your interest. I am specifically interested in ADO.net methods > that outperform ADODB, so unfortunately DAO is not allowed. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> >> VB MVP William (Bill) Vaughn - 11 Jan 2006 05:48 GMT Yes, and a bicycle can get through city traffic faster than a car, but you get kinda wet in the rain and you can't carry much where you're going.
 Signature ____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________
> You won't find any winners. The poor performance > is not because of your ignorance. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >>> >>> VB MVP Sahil Malik [MVP C#] - 11 Jan 2006 09:26 GMT Y'know what I find funny here is, someone is trying to get hardcore performance out of "access". But this contest makes a good point - ADOc is still better in certain borderline cases.
- Sahil Malik
> Yes, and a bicycle can get through city traffic faster than a car, but you > get kinda wet in the rain and you can't carry much where you're going. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >>>> >>>> VB MVP bdwest - 11 Jan 2006 23:26 GMT I have acutally had some people give me a little bit of hard time about using Access. I am currently working on a surface water hydrologic model that has to interface with a groundwater model that is run by a consultant of ours. Access was chosen as the "best" way to transfer the data to another party and still allow us to summarize and answer question about the data using SQL or tools in Access. After a model run I may have have 100,000 + records to write to the database so I want to do it as fast as possible. Hence this contest.
I am an water resources engineer who does quite a bit of software development in the area of hydrology. I had minimal computer science training back in my college days - not that it would matter after nearly 20-years. I have learned everything on my own and don't necessarily know the best way of getting something done. I can normally figure out a way to do something but it may be flawed as Frans points out. I have had some excellent input here and I appreciate the interest.
Brian
> Y'know what I find funny here is, someone is trying to get hardcore > performance out of "access". [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > >>>> > >>>> VB MVP john smith - 11 Jan 2006 23:47 GMT > I have acutally had some people give me a little bit of hard time about using > Access. I am currently working on a surface water hydrologic model that has [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >> Y'know what I find funny here is, someone is trying to get hardcore >> performance out of "access". I was thinking pretty much the same thing as Shahil when I saw your post, but I can see your point. Although, exchanging SQL Server Express MDF files isn't really harder than using MDB files, the DB is free (with a good upgrade path and all), no big learning curve, it performs very well - a very good/solid RDBMS compared to Jet (access). You can definitely learn this on your own too. And as for using Access' tools, you can create "linked" tables in access as well... If you want speed, it's worth looking into (there's MANY more benefits - not just speed).
Frans Bouma [C# MVP] - 11 Jan 2006 08:55 GMT > May I use DAO 3.6 instead of ADO.NET or ADODB ? > > I think DAO is the fastest way to deal with Access databases. > > Regards from Madrid (Spain) > Jesús López No, ODBC is (if I recall correctly). That is, raw C++ with odbc.
FB
 Signature ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cor Ligthert [MVP] - 11 Jan 2006 09:57 GMT >> May I use DAO 3.6 instead of ADO.NET or ADODB ? >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > No, ODBC is (if I recall correctly). That is, raw C++ with odbc. If you use a Ferrari maybe, however with a bicycle it is much slower.
What has ODBC to do with comparing DAO, ADO or ADONET?
There have been more discussions about this subject in this newsgroup where Paul Clement was often in involved. (There are more regulars, however Paul is in my mind equivalent for DAO).
In my opinion not any homemade software can be as advice to deal with Access. because you never know if it is reliable for the given problem.
Which as well does not mean that I would ever advice to use DAO in any Net environment.
Just my thought,
Cor
Frans Bouma [C# MVP] - 11 Jan 2006 11:58 GMT > >> May I use DAO 3.6 instead of ADO.NET or ADODB ? > > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > What has ODBC to do with comparing DAO, ADO or ADONET? erm... you can use odbc instead of oledb in ado.net? Accessing access is done through oledb, so picking odbc is the same.
FB
 Signature ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
William (Bill) Vaughn - 11 Jan 2006 17:38 GMT Ah, actually, accessing an Access database is done through JET. If you use a generic interface like OLE DB or ODBC from any data access interface (DAI) you get...
DAI -> System.Data.OleDb -> JET .NET provider -> JET API or DAI -> System.Data.Odbc-> JET ODBC driver-> JET API or DAI -> ODBC API-> JET ODBC driver-> JET API or DAI -> OLE DB COM interface-> JET OLE DB provider-> JET API unless you use DAO DAO->JET API
Trying to get more performance out of JET by choosing one provider is an interesting approach, but hardly useful. ODBC, OLE DB are "one-size-fits-all" (OSFA) interfaces designed to permit a (mostly) common DAI to be able to access a variety of backend data sources like JET, SQL Server, Oracle, DB2 and the rest. To access a data source with the least overhead, you need to use the "native language" interface--not a generic intermediate layer. Most DBMSs has their own unique native language. For JET the only public interface is DAO as its API interface is not published outside of Microsoft. For SQL Server the public interface is DB-Library (the TDS protocol is proprietary).
However, arguing which is faster is academic. It's not how fast you ask the question, its how fast the question can be answered that determines true database performance. DAO, RDO, ADO, ADO.NET and the OSFA interfaces were not designed for bulk operations as your test suggests. They are query interfaces and they all wait at the same speed. For SQL Server (and other business-class DBMSs), there are special utilities (BCP/DTS etc.) that are specifically designed do this work. JET has no such utility--but Access does. Access knows how to use JET APIs and locking schemes to import data faster than any DAO-driven program can. There are also JET Replication Object (JRO) COM APIs that developers can use to manipulate JET databases.
Again, the ability to flood a database with data is not a typical application task--especially not with a database engine like JET. The various data access interfaces listed above were designed to make programming easier, to make development of code generators easier, to make it possible to access data without having to know how to use the complicated ODBC API and the mind-boggling OLE DB COM++ interface. ADO.NET has done something different for most backend data sources--it has exposed new "managed" .NET Data Providers that speak the native tongue of specific backends. These provider are widely available. The Framework ships with SQL Server and Oracle managed providers as well as an Odbc .NET Provider. It also includes an OleDb .NET Provider that's suitable only for cases where a "native" managed provider is not available. This is the case for JET and one reason why it takes longer to get data to and from JET via ADO.NET.
And folks, even a Ferrari won't beat a bicycle in heavy traffic. Anyone who has witnesses traffic in Bangkok can tell you that.
hth
 Signature ____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________
>> >> May I use DAO 3.6 instead of ADO.NET or ADODB ? >> > > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > FB Cor Ligthert [MVP] - 11 Jan 2006 18:01 GMT Bill,
> And folks, even a Ferrari won't beat a bicycle in heavy traffic. Anyone > who has witnesses traffic in Bangkok can tell you that. Right answer, when I had sent it I thougt about that, although the city I was thinking on was Amsterdam, did you ever see all those bicycles in Amsterdam?
Although that it is in the city where Frans lives the same.
:-) Cor
bdwest - 11 Jan 2006 23:32 GMT Bill,
Please see the reply to Sahil for the reason of going through this excercise. I agree, this is not a typical use of Access.
Thanks for your comments.
Brian
> Ah, actually, accessing an Access database is done through JET. If you use a > generic interface like OLE DB or ODBC from any data access interface (DAI) [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > > > > FB William (Bill) Vaughn - 12 Jan 2006 00:23 GMT If all you want to do is transport data then you don't need JET or SQL Server. All you need to do is create a delimited file. I worked in the process control industry for awhile and we found fixed-width or comma or tab-delimited files transfers are a fast and easy was to move data. Virtually all DBMS engines know how to import from these file and they can't be beat for speed.
 Signature ____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________
> Bill, > [quoted text clipped - 92 lines] >> > >> > FB Frans Bouma [C# MVP] - 11 Jan 2006 10:51 GMT > I am sponsoring a contest to see if someone can come up with ADO.net > code to insert records into a MS Access 2003 database faster than [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > http://www.kelbli.net/kb1/AdoNetContest.html The OleDb provider's ExecuteNonQuery statement is the bottleneck, according to my profiling.
Nevertheless, your code is also pretty flawed. If I look at the paramsAddInsert method, you don't re-use the parameters in the command, nor do you prepare the command for re-use.
Re-using the parameters and preparing the statement, also specifying a length for the varchar makes the code go from 37 to 13 seconds. (adodb is 7).
So if I use this code: Public Function AdoDotNet_paramsAddInsert(ByVal dbname As String) As Boolean 'Test inserting 30000 records into an Access database table using ADO.net 'with the parameters.add method
Dim DBcon As OleDbConnection Dim mycmd As New OleDbCommand Dim x As Integer Dim d As Date
' create the connection string Dim conString As String = "Provider=MicroSoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;" & _ "Data Source=" & dbname
'Create the insert statement with place holders for particular values mycmd.CommandText = "insert into Table1 (RecDate, Name, num, num2) values(?, ?, ?, ?)"
' open the connection DBcon = New OleDbConnection(conString) mycmd.Connection = DBcon DBcon.Open() mycmd.Parameters.Add(New OleDb.OleDbParameter("@RecDate", OleDb.OleDbType.Date)) mycmd.Parameters.Add(New OleDb.OleDbParameter("@Name", OleDb.OleDbType.VarChar, 50)) mycmd.Parameters.Add(New OleDb.OleDbParameter("@num", OleDb.OleDbType.Integer)) mycmd.Parameters.Add(New OleDb.OleDbParameter("@num2", OleDb.OleDbType.Integer)) mycmd.Prepare() 'insert the records For x = 1 To 30000 d = DateAdd(DateInterval.Day, x, #1/1/1925#) mycmd.Parameters(0).Value = d mycmd.Parameters(1).Value = "M3" mycmd.Parameters(2).Value = x mycmd.Parameters(3).Value = x ^ 2
mycmd.ExecuteNonQuery() Next
DBcon.Close() mycmd = Nothing DBcon = Nothing End Function
I get 13 seconds. (funny thing is that release builds or debug builds don't matter much, which likely is caused by the fact that the overall time is spend in the non-managed oledb code)
This is the fastest you can possibly get. The rest of the time is spend in ExecuteNonQuery.
For bulk inserts, this is a pretty solid method, though bulk inserts are a special case in data-access. In general, bulk inserts are often better done by special programs like DTS than by general purpose data-access methods simply because bulk inserts can take shortcuts like the code above does, but general purpose data-access code can't do that, which means that such code has to prepare a query for every row to insert, which is also why a dataset insert is much slower than this special purpose method.
btw, a simple Prepare call and a length specification for the varchar brings down the proc method from 28 to 19 seconds.
Frans
 Signature ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
William (Bill) Vaughn - 11 Jan 2006 17:47 GMT Try beginning a transaction before these updates and see what happens. As it is JET won't write these rows to the database until it's "idle" so it's not really measuring anything except moving rows to JET's database cache in memory. When uploading to SQL Server (and not using BCP) we roll our own INSERT statements and fill in the values using string replacement tags. However, I expect the Parameter approach is going to fare well against the raw INSERT technique since you can't batch them in JET. You might also try executing the INSERT asynchronously and do the prep work while you're waiting.
 Signature ____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________
>> I am sponsoring a contest to see if someone can come up with ADO.net >> code to insert records into a MS Access 2003 database faster than [quoted text clipped - 97 lines] > > Frans Frans Bouma [C# MVP] - 12 Jan 2006 08:30 GMT > Try beginning a transaction before these updates and see what > happens. As it is JET won't write these rows to the database until [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > executing the INSERT asynchronously and do the prep work while you're > waiting. Ah , that's why starting a transaction before the dataset write started was saving 7-8 seconds! I already wondered why on earth it could be faster when it was in a transction...
FB
 Signature ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
bdwest - 11 Jan 2006 23:09 GMT Frans,
Thanks for pointing out problems with my code. Your changes show significant improvements. I am seeing about 8 seconds on the ADODB method and about 16-18 seconds with your changes. I really appreciate your input.
Brian
> > I am sponsoring a contest to see if someone can come up with ADO.net > > code to insert records into a MS Access 2003 database faster than [quoted text clipped - 98 lines] > Frans > Jesús López - 11 Jan 2006 14:35 GMT Hi Brian,
Here you have a code using the ADO.NET OleDb Provider and StreamWriter that is 6 to 8 times faster than your ADODB method:
Sub Reward100(ByVal dbname As String)
'the first person to provide me with a ADO.net based function that will insert the 30,000 records into the database 'as shown in the other functions of this class will receive a cashier check for US $100. There is only one reward 'no other external references aloud
'reward code goes here 'Test inserting 30000 records into an Access database table using StreamWriter and ADO.NET. 'This function is 6 to 9 times faster than the ADODB method
Dim x As Integer Dim d As Date
Dim FormatProvider As IFormatProvider = Globalization.CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo("en-US") Dim writer As New StreamWriter("Table1.txt")
'insert records into a file text' For x = 1 To 30000 d = DateAdd(DateInterval.Day, x, #1/1/1925#)
writer.Write("M1") : writer.Write(vbTab) writer.Write(d.ToString("d", FormatProvider)) : writer.Write(vbTab) writer.Write(x) : writer.Write(vbTab) writer.Write(x ^ 2) : writer.Write(vbNewLine) Next writer.Close()
'create Schema.ini writer = New StreamWriter("Schema.ini") writer.WriteLine("[Table1.txt]") writer.WriteLine("Format = TabDelimited") writer.WriteLine("ColNameHeader = False") writer.WriteLine("Col1 = name Text Width 50") writer.WriteLine("Col2 = recdate DateTime") writer.WriteLine("Col3 = num Single") writer.WriteLine("Col4 = num2 Single") writer.Close()
'insert records into Access Database Dim conString As String = "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=" & dbname & ";Persist Security Info=False" Dim cn As New OleDbConnection(conString)
Dim query As String = "INSERT INTO Table1 " & _ "SELECT name, recdate, num, num2 FROM [Table1#txt] " & _ "IN '" & Application.StartupPath & "' 'Text;';"
Dim cmdInsert As New OleDbCommand(query, cn) cn.Open() cmdInsert.ExecuteNonQuery() cn.Close() End Sub
Regards from Madrid (Spain)
Jesús López VB MVP
>I am sponsoring a contest to see if someone can come up with ADO.net code >to [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Brian William (Bill) Vaughn - 11 Jan 2006 17:49 GMT Give him the money. It might also be interesting to see if the Odbc to JET driver approach would be faster as it has less COM overhead.
 Signature ____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________
> Hi Brian, > [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] >> >> Brian Jesús López - 12 Jan 2006 12:34 GMT You are right Bill
The ODBC method takes as long as the ADODB (keyset server side cursor) method.
The ODBC ADO.NET method: 6 seconds The ADODB method: 6 seconds The OleDb ADO.NET method: 12 seconds The "StreamWriter + Just one Query" method that I posed: 1 second.
Here is the code:
Sub OdbcAdoNet(ByVal dbname As String) Dim cnString As String = "DRIVER={Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)};DBQ=" & Application.StartupPath & "\" & dbname Dim cn As New OdbcConnection(cnString) Dim query As String = "INSERT INTO Table1(Name, recdate, num, num2) VALUES(?,?,?,?)" Dim cmd As New OdbcCommand(query, cn) cmd.Parameters.Add("Name", OdbcType.VarChar, 50) cmd.Parameters.Add("recdate", OdbcType.Date) cmd.Parameters.Add("num", OdbcType.Real) cmd.Parameters.Add("num2", OdbcType.Real) cn.Open() cmd.Prepare() For x As Integer = 1 To 30000 Dim d As DateTime = DateAdd(DateInterval.Day, x, #1/1/1925#) With cmd.Parameters .Item("Name").Value = "M1" .Item("recdate").Value = d .Item("num").Value = x .Item("num2").Value = x ^ 2 End With cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() Next cn.Close() End Sub
Public Sub OleDbAdoNet(ByVal dbname As String) Dim conString As String = "Provider=MicroSoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=" & dbname Dim DBcon As New OleDbConnection(conString) Dim query As String = "insert into Table1 (RecDate, Name, num, num2) values(?, ?, ?, ?)" Dim mycmd As New OleDbCommand(query, DBcon) mycmd.Parameters.Add("Recdate", OleDbType.Date) mycmd.Parameters.Add("Name", OleDbType.VarChar, 50) mycmd.Parameters.Add("num", OleDbType.Single) mycmd.Parameters.Add("num2", OleDbType.Single) DBcon.Open() mycmd.Prepare() For x As Integer = 1 To 30000 Dim d As Date = DateAdd(DateInterval.Day, x, #1/1/1925#) With mycmd.Parameters .Item("Recdate").Value = d .Item("Name").Value = "M1" .Item("num").Value = x .Item("num2").Value = x ^ 2 End With mycmd.ExecuteNonQuery() Next DBcon.Close() End Sub
Regards from Madrid (Spain)
Jesús López VB MVP
Paul Clement - 12 Jan 2006 20:05 GMT ¤ Give him the money. ¤ It might also be interesting to see if the Odbc to JET driver approach would ¤ be faster as it has less COM overhead.
...and less functionality and less stability. ;-)
Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
Jesús López - 12 Jan 2006 20:51 GMT Why are you saying that ODBC has less stability? Are you able prove it ?
ODBC has a long history. It is a very mature techonology, and it is very fast ...
Regards from Madrid (Spain)
Jesús López VB MVP
William (Bill) Vaughn - 13 Jan 2006 00:48 GMT I understand that the ODBC _driver_ for JET databases was originally written to solve a specific problem with Microsoft Office many years ago and was never intended to be used for serious production work. It only exposes the bare essentials of the JET paradigm so it can't do a whole litany of things. It has nothing to do with the strengths/weaknesses of ODBC.
 Signature ____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________
> Why are you saying that ODBC has less stability? Are you able prove it ? > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Jesús López > VB MVP Paul Clement - 13 Jan 2006 14:17 GMT ¤ Why are you saying that ODBC has less stability? Are you able prove it ? ¤ ¤ ODBC has a long history. It is a very mature techonology, and it is very ¤ fast ... ¤
What Bill said. Microsoft recommends that you use the Jet OLEDB provider instead.
And yes, some features are not supported by the MS Access ODBC driver, such as those in ADOX.
Just to repeat, it's not ODBC that is the issue but the MS Access driver.
Paul ~~~~ Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
Jesús López - 14 Jan 2006 09:04 GMT I think comparing Jet to SQLite is also interesting. The following code takes just one second to complete:
Sub SQLiteInsert(ByVal dbname As String) Dim cnString As String = "Data Source=dbtest1.db" Dim cn As New SQLiteConnection(cnString)
Dim query As String = "INSERT INTO Table1(Name, recdate, num, num2) VALUES($Name,$recdate,$num,$num2)" Dim cmd As New SQLiteCommand(query, cn) cmd.Parameters.Add("$Name", DbType.String, 50) cmd.Parameters.Add("$recdate", DbType.DateTime) cmd.Parameters.Add("$num", DbType.Single) cmd.Parameters.Add("$num2", DbType.Single) cn.Open() Dim tran As SQLiteTransaction = cn.BeginTransaction() cmd.Prepare() For x As Integer = 1 To 30000 Dim d As DateTime = DateAdd(DateInterval.Day, x, #1/1/1925#) With cmd.Parameters .Item("$Name").Value = "M1" .Item("$recdate").Value = d .Item("$num").Value = x .Item("$num2").Value = x ^ 2 End With cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() Next tran.Commit() cn.Close() End Sub
I'm using ADO.NET 2.0 Provider for SQLite:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlite-dotnet2
Regards from Madrid (Spain)
Jesús López VB MVP
bdwest - 11 Jan 2006 22:52 GMT Jesus.
I am have a little problem running your code. I get an error on the cn.open line the error is
"Could not find installable ISAM"
Any Ideas?
Out broadband connection has been down all day and I am logged in via modem which is painfully slow so can not really reasearch the issue.
Please let me know if you have any ideas as to how to correct the problem.
Thanks
Brian
> Hi Brian, > [quoted text clipped - 95 lines] > > > > Brian Jesús López - 12 Jan 2006 00:06 GMT Brian,
This kwnoledge base article will likely help you to solve the problem:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/209805
I'm using the Text ISAM.
Regards from Madrid (Spain)
Jesús López VB MVP
Jesús López - 12 Jan 2006 00:23 GMT Also:
http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb;en-us;273458&spid=3042&sid=1335 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;283881
bdwest - 12 Jan 2006 04:17 GMT Jesus, I have tried the items suggested by Microsoft with no luck. The registry keys look OK. The mstext40.dll is there and I even re-registered it and I still get the ISAM error. It is also suggest re-installing MS office and I am not going to do that. Here is the query string produced on my computer. Is this correct?
"INSERT INTO Table1 SELECT name, recdate, num, num2 FROM [Table1#txt] IN 'D:\VB.Net Projects\DBtest\bin' 'Text;';"
I don’t understand the last part. 'D:\VB.Net Projects\DBtest\bin' 'Text;';"
Also, how does the schema.ini file come into the picture.
Thanks
Brian
> Also: > > http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb;en-us;273458&spid=3042&sid=1335 > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;283881 Jesús López - 12 Jan 2006 08:19 GMT Oops!! You said me that the error was in cn.Open !!! So the error is in the connection string.
That is nothing to do with ISAMs because I'm not specifiying more than an Access database in the connection string. Perhaps you introduced a litle change to the connection string when you copied and pasted the code.
I'm pasting the code again, but in HTML format. In this way, no line breaks will be introduced. I have simplified the connection string and removed the culture info which is not neccesary, actually this might cause errors.
Sub Reward100(ByVal dbname As String)
Dim x As Integer
Dim d As Date
Dim writer As New StreamWriter("Table1.txt")
'insert records into Table1.txt text file'
For x = 1 To 30000
d = DateAdd(DateInterval.Day, x, #1/1/1925#)
writer.Write("M1") : writer.Write(vbTab)
writer.Write(d.ToString("d"))
writer.Write(vbTab)
writer.Write(x) : writer.Write(vbTab)
writer.Write(x ^ 2) : writer.Write(vbNewLine)
Next
writer.Close()
'create Schema.ini
writer = New StreamWriter("Schema.ini")
writer.WriteLine("[Table1.txt]")
writer.WriteLine("Format = TabDelimited")
writer.WriteLine("ColNameHeader = False")
writer.WriteLine("Col1 = name Text Width 50")
writer.WriteLine("Col2 = recdate DateTime")
writer.WriteLine("Col3 = num Single")
writer.WriteLine("Col4 = num2 Single")
writer.Close()
'insert records into Access Database
Dim conString As String = "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=" & dbname
Dim cn As New OleDbConnection(conString)
Dim query As String = "INSERT INTO Table1 " & _
"SELECT name, recdate, num, num2 FROM [Table1#txt] " & _
"IN '" & Application.StartupPath & "' 'Text;';"
Dim cmdInsert As New OleDbCommand(query, cn)
cn.Open()
cmdInsert.ExecuteNonQuery()
cn.Close()
End Sub
The IN Clause
Jet SQL has an extension to the SQL language: the IN clause. The IN clause allows you to specify tables from external databases. These external databases can be: a.. Other Access databases b.. ISAM databases such as text files, dBase, Paradox and so on. c.. Databases accessed via ODBC The sintax for the IN clause is :
IN ExternalDatabaseSpecifier
The external database specifier sintax for text files is:
'PathToTheFolderWhereTheTextFilesReside' ' Text;'
The Schema.ini file
Since the text file itself does not has information in it that describes its format (tab delimited, fixed lenght, etc) and structure (field names and field types), a way must exists to specify this information. You can specify this information by including a Schema.ini file in the folder where the text files reside. Please take a look to the following:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/odbc/htm/odbcje tschema_ini_file.asp
Regards from Madrid (Spain)
Jess Lpez VB MVP
Jesús López - 12 Jan 2006 09:29 GMT Ohh :-(. Sorry.I had a lot of grammar mistakes in this message
bdwest - 12 Jan 2006 18:00 GMT Jesús in Madrid wins the contest.
He has requested that the $100 be donated
to Medicins Sans Frontiers: http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/
which I will do.
Thanks for all the discussion and suggestions. I really didn't think anyone could beat the ADODB method but I was proved wrong.
Please take a look at the following page for the details of the winning entry
http://www.kelbli.net/kb1/AdoNetContest.html
Thanks to all.
Brian
> Ohh :-(. Sorry.I had a lot of grammar mistakes in this message Frans Bouma [C# MVP] - 12 Jan 2006 08:27 GMT Amazing :)
FB
> Hi Brian, > [quoted text clipped - 87 lines] > > Note there > > is only one reward.
 Signature ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
|
|