Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / ASP.NET / General / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

small data needed - suggestions?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bobby Edward - 04 Mar 2008 15:50 GMT
I am doing a funeral home page (depressing huh?) :)

They want an obituary page where people can post comments.  So, in my db I
have 2 tables (1 to many relationship)...
TABLE1:  Obituary (persons info)
TABLE2:  ObitComments ("many" table - comments)

There would be an admin page to approve or reject comments, manage
obituaries, etc...

My ISP only allows me a certain # of SQL Server dbs.  I would hate to
"waste" one on a small project like this.  Any suggestions?  How would you
handle it?  SQL Express is not supported either.

Thanks!
sloan - 04 Mar 2008 15:57 GMT
For something with RARE writes...and many reads..you can get by with either

Access (Jet) (.mdb)
or
SqLite

I'm working on a prototype using the FActory Pattern and supporting multiple
RDBMS.

Go here
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/
or
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/feed.rss

(search for "multiple rdbms")

and if I don't have it up yet...email me and I'll send you a copy.

>I am doing a funeral home page (depressing huh?) :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Thanks!
Bobby Edward - 04 Mar 2008 16:01 GMT
In your opinion what is "RARE" writes?  5 or less concurrent?

> For something with RARE writes...and many reads..you can get by with
> either
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>> Thanks!
sloan - 04 Mar 2008 16:11 GMT
1 per minute??

Just not an overloaded amount of simutaneous writes.

Since this is a web app (I'm assuming)...then the web server talking to an
Access(JET) database locally..is not that big of a deal.

Access can handle a light load of 5-10 simutanaeous users in my opinion.

Your obituary thing...if you have 1 db per deceased person....would be fine
for this imho.

...

> In your opinion what is "RARE" writes?  5 or less concurrent?
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>>
>>> Thanks!
Bobby Edward - 04 Mar 2008 17:30 GMT
1 db per deceased person?  Or 1 db record?

> 1 per minute??
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
sloan - 04 Mar 2008 17:31 GMT
Sorry, I mispoke.

One db per person would be too much.

Look at my blog...and you could easily start with 1 db.
And then use the Factory method to even use multiple Access(Jet) database
files (.mdb).
Like use the key system, and base it on the person's first letter of their
last name.

THe factory pattern gives you options.

A-I (obituarydb1.mdb)
J-R(obituarydb2.mdb)
S-Z(obituarydb3.mdb)

or start with 1 .mdb and only go to N .mdb's if you need to.

> 1 per minute??
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
Bobby Edward - 04 Mar 2008 17:36 GMT
hmmm i never heard of the factory method - i must read up on it - THANKS
SLOAN!!!!

> Sorry, I mispoke.
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
sloan - 04 Mar 2008 18:11 GMT
I have a blog entry that is ~just~ about the Simple Factory pattern as well.

http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!A68482B9628A842A!126.entry

> hmmm i never heard of the factory method - i must read up on it - THANKS
> SLOAN!!!!
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
Mark Rae [MVP] - 04 Mar 2008 17:03 GMT
> My ISP only allows me a certain # of SQL Server dbs.  I would hate to
> "waste" one on a small project like this.  Any suggestions?  How would you
> handle it?  SQL Express is not supported either.

In addition to Sloan's comments, what's stopping you creating the two tables
you suggest in an existing SQL Server database...?

Signature

Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

Bobby Edward - 04 Mar 2008 17:30 GMT
To be honest, I like the simplicity of having the data in 1 file, an mdb.
It's easy to backup and move around.  I'm a small fry developer.  :)

>> My ISP only allows me a certain # of SQL Server dbs.  I would hate to
>> "waste" one on a small project like this.  Any suggestions?  How would
>> you handle it?  SQL Express is not supported either.
>
> In addition to Sloan's comments, what's stopping you creating the two
> tables you suggest in an existing SQL Server database...?
Mark Rae [MVP] - 04 Mar 2008 17:40 GMT
>>> My ISP only allows me a certain # of SQL Server dbs.  I would hate to
>>> "waste" one on a small project like this.  Any suggestions?  How would
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> To be honest, I like the simplicity of having the data in 1 file, an mdb.
> It's easy to backup and move around.

Er, OK...

Signature

Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

Jeff Dillon - 04 Mar 2008 22:58 GMT
Or store it in a xml file

>>>> My ISP only allows me a certain # of SQL Server dbs.  I would hate to
>>>> "waste" one on a small project like this.  Any suggestions?  How would
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Er, OK...

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.