Wow! Incredible.
Thanks.
What's wrong with using a SQL Server login? It might be better for throughput
because connection pooling is based on the connection string, which would be
the same for all users.
-- Peter
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short Urls & more: http://ittyurl.net
> Wow! Incredible.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > http://forums.asp.net/t/1119229.aspx
> > http://p2p.wrox.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=25837
Hi folks,
I have the same problem, but I don't agree Mark Rae : It is possible to use
integrated authentication even if IIS and SQL are on different servers.
Have a look on these links :
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms998292.aspx
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms998355.aspx
> Wow! Incredible.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > http://forums.asp.net/t/1119229.aspx
> > http://p2p.wrox.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=25837
Mark Rae [MVP] - 07 Mar 2008 12:36 GMT
> I have the same problem, but I don't agree Mark Rae : It is possible to
> use
> integrated authentication even if IIS and SQL are on different servers.
It was Jeff Dillon, not me, who said that...

Signature
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
Jeff Dillon - 07 Mar 2008 18:25 GMT
If you want to use Kerberos delegation, then yes. Have you tried it? Any
luck?
> Hi folks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> > http://forums.asp.net/t/1119229.aspx
>> > http://p2p.wrox.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=25837