
Signature
Alan Silver
(anything added below this line is nothing to do with me)
Your list sounds pretty accurate for the top 3. For something much simpler,
you can try the "My Web Pages Starter Kit" which can be found on codeplex.com
-- Peter
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
MetaFinder: http://www.blogmetafinder.com
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> TIA
Alan Silver - 21 Jan 2008 19:44 GMT
>Your list sounds pretty accurate for the top 3. For something much
>simpler, you can try the "My Web Pages Starter Kit" which can be found
>on codeplex.com
Thanks, that looks good too. I might have a play.

Signature
Alan Silver
(anything added below this line is nothing to do with me)
> I have looked around and seen a few, but I have no idea of their relative
> merits. The ones that seem to stick out are Umbraco, DotNetNuke and
> Community Server. Anyone any experience of these?
I was asked to look at DotNetNuke a couple of years ago, and absolutely
hated it... If you ever need to deviate from the defaults, even slightly,
you have to jump through so many hoops that it's almost not worth bothering
with...
From what I've seen of Umbraco, it's fairly cumbersome... And, something
which may be of concern to you, is that it seems to be written by a couple
of guys in their spare time...

Signature
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
Scott Roberts - 21 Jan 2008 18:36 GMT
> From what I've seen of Umbraco, it's fairly cumbersome... And, something
> which may be of concern to you, is that it seems to be written by a couple
> of guys in their spare time...
Kinda like MS-DOS? ;)
Alan Silver - 21 Jan 2008 19:43 GMT
>> I have looked around and seen a few, but I have no idea of their
>>relative merits. The ones that seem to stick out are Umbraco,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>slightly, you have to jump through so many hoops that it's almost not
>worth bothering with...
Yeah, I seem to remember having that feeling with one of the starter
kits MS produced to introduce people to ASP.NET. I gave up with it
fairly quickly ;-)
Still, I may have a look and see what it does. My requirements for this
job are fairly vanilla, so it may do. I could do with something that
will get me up and running quickly.
>From what I've seen of Umbraco, it's fairly cumbersome... And,
>something which may be of concern to you, is that it seems to be
>written by a couple of guys in their spare time...
Hmm, that's worth knowing.
Thanks for the reply

Signature
Alan Silver
(anything added below this line is nothing to do with me)
On Jan 21, 5:21 pm, Alan Silver <alan-sil...@nospam.thanx.invalid>
wrote:
> able to recommend
No
> any others?
www.axcms.net
Alan Silver - 22 Jan 2008 14:33 GMT
In article
<6e8e6004-3c98-4103-945c-c785f446fa4c@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Alexey Smirnov <alexey.smirnov@gmail.com> writes
>On Jan 21, 5:21 pm, Alan Silver <alan-sil...@nospam.thanx.invalid>
>wrote:
>> able to recommend
>
>No
Meaning you wouldn't recommend any of them, or you haven't used them, so
can't say one way or the other?
>> any others?
>
>www.axcms.net
Wow! That's an amazing system for free!
It looks like a nightmare to get installed though ;-(
Have you used this system? I'm wondering what you thought of it.
Thanks for the link. I can see this will require some time for
investigation.

Signature
Alan Silver
(anything added below this line is nothing to do with me)
Alexey Smirnov - 03 Feb 2008 14:25 GMT
On Jan 22, 3:33 pm, Alan Silver <alan-sil...@nospam.thanx.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <6e8e6004-3c98-4103-945c-c785f446f...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thanks for the link. I can see this will require some time for
> investigation.
Hi Alan, I was testing one of the previous versions and found it too
complex for my projects.