> Thanks Scott. We do have the .NET 2.0 framework installed in addition to
> .NET 1.1. Are you saying.NET 2.0 components cannot be accessed from ASP.NET
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks Phill. This helps.
My bad, I though it may be possible to “configure” a specific component of
.NET 1.1 application to use .NET 2.0 framework (which is what we want as we
do not want to migrate the entire application to .NET 2.0 platform). I guess
a single process/domain can use only one target framework at a time.
Thanks,
Rasheed
> > Thanks Scott. We do have the .NET 2.0 framework installed in addition to
> > .NET 1.1. Are you saying.NET 2.0 components cannot be accessed from ASP.NET
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> Yes, ASP.NET v 2 is backward compatible with v 1.1 but that's only
> because it was developed with full knowledge of the previous version.
Scott M. - 30 Dec 2007 01:31 GMT
The .NET Framework consists of a set of base classes and a Common Language
Runtime. The various CLR's are not forward compatible as version 1.1's
runtime would not understand something introduced in the 2.0 Framework.
If you wish to use any portion of 2.0, you must upgrade your application to
be an ASP .NET 2.0 applicaiton. The good news is that if you do migrate the
1.1 application to 2.0, everything that used to work will still work as 2.0
is backward compatible with 1.1, even though 1.1 is not forward compatible
with 2.0. If you already have the 2.0 Framework installed on your servers,
this is going to be your best bet.
-Scott
> Thanks Phill. This helps.
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>> Yes, ASP.NET v 2 is backward compatible with v 1.1 but that's only
>> because it was developed with full knowledge of the previous version.
Rasheed - 30 Dec 2007 01:41 GMT
Thanks Scot. Appreciate your feedback.
Abdul
> The .NET Framework consists of a set of base classes and a Common Language
> Runtime. The various CLR's are not forward compatible as version 1.1's
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> >> Yes, ASP.NET v 2 is backward compatible with v 1.1 but that's only
> >> because it was developed with full knowledge of the previous version.