> We use the Telerik upload control (as well as their other controls) and it
> does fine for files that size. It does *not* load the entire file into
> server memory (like the standard FileUpload) and provides progress bars
> too.
Sounds like what I need.
In general, is it safe to say one should invest in this type of option for
anything over a couple megs in size?
-Darrel
Scott Roberts - 21 Dec 2007 21:26 GMT
>> We use the Telerik upload control (as well as their other controls) and
>> it does fine for files that size. It does *not* load the entire file into
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> In general, is it safe to say one should invest in this type of option for
> anything over a couple megs in size?
It's difficult to generalize such a thing. If you are developing an intranet
app that will be run exclusively over a LAN, then you probably don't need a
progress bar for a 2MB file. On the other hand, if you expect users to be
connected over dial-up, then you'd probably want a progress bar for even the
smallest of file uploads.