Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / ASP.NET / General / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

LARGE file upload components/controls/add-ons?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
darrel - 21 Dec 2007 16:57 GMT
I briefly researched this a year or so ago for a project that never
materialized, but now I'm in the midst of one and need to look into this a
bit more.

I'm working on a site where the client want people to be able to upload
files up to 50mb in size via the web site. It's a contact form. Form
information is emailed, file is uploaded to server, and client can then
click on a link to go download the file that was uploaded.

Due to the size of these, I'm thinking a standard file upload control isn't
going to work and that I should invest in a more robust option that includes
the ability to 'tickle' the server to keep the connection open as well as
providing some sort of status/progress bar for the person uploading the
large file.

Any particular product anyone would recommend? It's a VB.net 1.1 web app,
btw.

-Darrel
Scott Roberts - 21 Dec 2007 18:47 GMT
>I briefly researched this a year or so ago for a project that never
>materialized, but now I'm in the midst of one and need to look into this a
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> -Darrel

We use the Telerik upload control (as well as their other controls) and it
does fine for files that size. It does *not* load the entire file into
server memory (like the standard FileUpload) and provides progress bars too.
darrel - 21 Dec 2007 21:16 GMT
> We use the Telerik upload control (as well as their other controls) and it
> does fine for files that size. It does *not* load the entire file into
> server memory (like the standard FileUpload) and provides progress bars
> too.

Sounds like what I need.

In general, is it safe to say one should invest in this type of option for
anything over a couple megs in size?

-Darrel
Scott Roberts - 21 Dec 2007 21:26 GMT
>> We use the Telerik upload control (as well as their other controls) and
>> it does fine for files that size. It does *not* load the entire file into
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> In general, is it safe to say one should invest in this type of option for
> anything over a couple megs in size?

It's difficult to generalize such a thing. If you are developing an intranet
app that will be run exclusively over a LAN, then you probably don't need a
progress bar for a 2MB file. On the other hand, if you expect users to be
connected over dial-up, then you'd probably want a progress bar for even the
smallest of file uploads.

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.