> Nevermind. I remembered Request.UrlReferrer

Signature
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
Thanks Mark. What are the alternatives?
David
>> Nevermind. I remembered Request.UrlReferrer
>
> Don't rely on this 100%, especially if your site is on the public
> Internet, as more and more ISPs are stripping it off HTML headers...
Mark Rae [MVP] - 10 Dec 2007 17:46 GMT
> Thanks Mark. What are the alternatives?
Session variables would probably be the simplest...

Signature
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
>> Nevermind. I remembered Request.UrlReferrer
> Don't rely on this 100%, especially if your site is on the public
> Internet, as more and more ISPs are stripping it off HTML headers...
WTF? really? why are they doing this?
Michael Nemtsev [MVP] - 10 Dec 2007 21:03 GMT
Hello Barrie,
just reduce unnecessary info for optimization
---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
BW> "Mark Rae [MVP]" <mark@markNOSPAMrae.net> wrote in message
BW> news:eH8A4i0OIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
BW>
>>> Nevermind. I remembered Request.UrlReferrer
>>>
>> Don't rely on this 100%, especially if your site is on the public
>> Internet, as more and more ISPs are stripping it off HTML headers...
BW> WTF? really? why are they doing this?
BW>
Mark Rae [MVP] - 10 Dec 2007 21:13 GMT
>>> Nevermind. I remembered Request.UrlReferrer
>
>> Don't rely on this 100%, especially if your site is on the public
>> Internet, as more and more ISPs are stripping it off HTML headers...
>
> WTF? really? why are they doing this?
Yes.

Signature
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net