> We've been here before, Alvin...

Signature
Regards,
Alvin Bruney
------------------------------------------------------
Shameless Author Plug
OWC Black Book 2nd Edition
Exclusively on www.lulu.com/owc
$24.99
>> We've been here before, Alvin...
>
> Precisely. You said it doesn't work. These articles do not support you
> claim. There is a difference between software not working and software not
> being supported.
Yes, but the reason it isn't supported is precisely because it doesn't work,
at least, not with any sort of reliability. There may be instances where it
will work for a while, but it really is a disaster waiting to happen.
>> For instance, in the second article you linked, it indicates:
>>
>> <quote>Regardless, it may be absolutely required to use Office in this
>> manner [server side automation]. </quote>
LOL! But that's just marketing...:-) Fact is, there is never *any* need need
to use server-side Office automation because there are other products
available which do the job reliably - they're just not Microsoft products...
The article also says: "We do not recommend or support Automation to a
Microsoft Office application from an unattended user account." That's much
more than simply not supporting it - Microsoft actively does not recommend
it...
The article also says: "Caution Automation of any Office application from an
unattended, non-interactive user account is risky and unstable." The clue
here is "risky and unstable"...
The article also says: "Warning Office was not designed, and is not safe,
for unattended execution on a server." The clue here is "not safe"...
We're way beyond "not supported" here...
> The chief reason for developers proceeding with office server automation
> is that microsoft has provided no suitable, cost-effective alternative.
That is completely true. It's also completely irrelevant:
http://www.aspose.com/Products/Default.aspx
> I recommend you modify your stance to Office server automation is not
> supported.
How about: "Server-side Office automation is not support and not recommended
because it is unsafe, risky and unstable due to the fact that Office was not
designed to be used in this manner"...

Signature
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
Alvin Bruney [MVP] - 20 Oct 2007 20:36 GMT
Don't get distracted, you said it doesn't work. That is simply not correct
and that is what I am pointing out.
To say that:
> there is never *any* need need to use server-side Office automation
is a statement you simply should not be making, for obvious reasons. It's ok
to peddle the Aspose product, but not at the expense of technically
incorrect information.

Signature
Regards,
Alvin Bruney
------------------------------------------------------
Shameless Author Plug
OWC Black Book 2nd Edition
Exclusively on www.lulu.com/owc
$24.99
>>> We've been here before, Alvin...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> recommended because it is unsafe, risky and unstable due to the fact that
> Office was not designed to be used in this manner"...
shashank kulkarni - 24 Oct 2007 14:34 GMT
Thanks all for your help.
We face this problem in QA environment and problem get solved by registring
office.
That team miss to register the Office 2007 :(
> Don't get distracted, you said it doesn't work. That is simply not correct
> and that is what I am pointing out.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> > recommended because it is unsafe, risky and unstable due to the fact that
> > Office was not designed to be used in this manner"...