Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / ASP.NET / General / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

.NET 2.0 converted.  Seems slow on production machine

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David C - 04 Sep 2007 09:57 GMT
I just converted an 1.X application to 2.0.

It is noticeably slow.  In fact, my development machine is faster.  It
just takes a lot longer for a page to load, and there aren't any
database calls involved.  Page loads are much more snappier on my
development machine which is just a 3 year old laptop whereas the
production server is new.  Can't tell you all the specs, but with 1.X,
the production server was a lot faster.

Just learning how .NET 2.0 assemblies work, so I am a novice in that
regard.  Any trouble shooting tips would be much appreciated.
Peter Bromberg [C# MVP] - 04 Sep 2007 12:10 GMT
ASP.NET 2.0 is definitely not "slower" than 1.1. Unfortunately there could be
any number of issues that could contribute to the problem you have, and so
you'll need to put on your Sherlock Holmes hat and perform some diagnostics.
You can find information on what to do, especially to get good health and
other diagnostics, at MSDN online.
-- Peter
Recursion: see Recursion
site:  http://www.eggheadcafe.com
unBlog:  http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
BlogMetaFinder:    http://www.blogmetafinder.com

> I just converted an 1.X application to 2.0.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Just learning how .NET 2.0 assemblies work, so I am a novice in that
> regard.  Any trouble shooting tips would be much appreciated.
David C - 04 Sep 2007 16:24 GMT
On Sep 4, 4:10 am, Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]
<pbromb...@yahoo.yohohhoandabottleofrum.com> wrote:
> ASP.NET 2.0 is definitely not "slower" than 1.1. Unfortunately there could be
> any number of issues that could contribute to the problem you have, and so
> you'll need to put on your Sherlock Holmes hat and perform some diagnostics.
> You can find information on what to do, especially to get good health and
> other diagnostics, at MSDN online.

Could you share some good MSDN links I can start out with?

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.