Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / ASP.NET / General / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

asp.net 1.1 on VS 2005?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mark - 02 Aug 2007 23:26 GMT
I have been using VS 2005 since its introduction. Prior to that I used VS
2003...For Windows Applications Programming.

Recently, I had need to develop a simple web form application which I did in
VS 2005. Then I tried to deploy it on a server that was running ASP.NET1.1
and not ASP.NET 2.0.

It would not run. I was informed that it could not be made to run. I tried
several hacks and work-arounds and failed.

I understand the question has come up before but I am (in my searches)
unable to find a coherent and unambiguous answer.

Can I, using VS 2005, develop web applications for servers running ASP.NET
1.1 only? If so, how?

Signature

mark b

Showjumper - 03 Aug 2007 00:22 GMT
Here are some links i found via google:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=vs2005+asp.net+1.1
The first 2 look promising.
>I have been using VS 2005 since its introduction. Prior to that I used VS
> 2003...For Windows Applications Programming.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Can I, using VS 2005, develop web applications for servers running ASP.NET
> 1.1 only? If so, how?
mr peanut - 03 Aug 2007 01:22 GMT
Two important things:

1) the jomo fisher hot fix hack is great for c# windows applications but
there is no obvious parallel patch for developing web forms (with any VS
language)

2) the side by side work-around (al least the one I looked into) requires
access to the server's iis and this is not possible when the server is a
private third party web hosting company.

> Here are some links i found via google:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=vs2005+asp.net+1.1
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> > Can I, using VS 2005, develop web applications for servers running ASP.NET
> > 1.1 only? If so, how?
Patrice - 03 Aug 2007 12:20 GMT
Do you still have VS 2003 installed ? If yes your best is IMO to install
side by side and use VS 2003 for 1.1 applications and VS 2005 for 2.0
applications.

For now each VS release is bind with a particular framework version though
hacks might be possible. VS 2008 shoudl allow to choose the targeted
framework (not sure which they'll suport thought).

--
Patrice

>I have been using VS 2005 since its introduction. Prior to that I used VS
> 2003...For Windows Applications Programming.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Can I, using VS 2005, develop web applications for servers running ASP.NET
> 1.1 only? If so, how?
Evan M. - 03 Aug 2007 13:24 GMT
> Do you still have VS 2003 installed ? If yes your best is IMO to install
> side by side and use VS 2003 for 1.1 applications and VS 2005 for 2.0
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

VS 2008 will support targeted Framerwork development for .NET 2.0,
3.0, and 3.5. You will still need previous versions of VS.NET for .NET
1.x development
mr peanut - 03 Aug 2007 15:06 GMT
When I tried to run VS2003 for web apps in parallel with VS 2005 I had to
install iis for the debugger. I was given the option to use asp.net 1.1 but
the file location for asp 1.1 was fixed at the framework 2.0 directory
(greyed out). When I ran the debugger on a program I got an error message:

Access to the path "d:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v1.1.4322\Temporary
ASP.NET Files\firstweb\9c9d46f0\ceeb61c0" is denied.

But, and this is weird, I couldn't change the permissions for the
d:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v1.1.4322\Temporary ASP.NET Files.  
(Interestingly, there were no items subordinate to this directory.) It would
appear to be changed but I continued to get the same error.

> > Do you still have VS 2003 installed ? If yes your best is IMO to install
> > side by side and use VS 2003 for 1.1 applications and VS 2005 for 2.0
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> 3.0, and 3.5. You will still need previous versions of VS.NET for .NET
> 1.x development

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.