Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / ASP.NET / General / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ASP.NET 2.0 deployment

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Venton - 28 Jun 2007 09:31 GMT
I am currently using VS 2003 ASP.NET 1.1
I like the way that deployment of a new assembly is so simple, I just
FTP the dll of the entire project across and that's it, none of the
web users are any the wiser. No source code on the server either.

I am thinking of upgrading to VS2005 / asp.net 2.0 but having a quick
and easy way of deploying changes is essential.

My app is a web shop, and there could be several users in the middle
of buying stuff.
If I have a change to make, I want to roll out the changes
instantaniously (eg just replace a dll).

Is this possible with VS 2005 / ASP.NET 2.0 or is it more complicated?

I don't want to knock people off the web sites or give them errors by
doing.

Any help from people with real world experience in this area much
appreciated.
Mark Rae - 28 Jun 2007 09:38 GMT
> Any help from people with real world experience in this area much
> appreciated.

Just make sure you install SP1 for VS.NET 2005 and use the web application
model - keep well away from the web site model...

Signature

http://www.markrae.net

bruce barker - 28 Jun 2007 17:00 GMT
asp.net 2.0 has several deployment options. if you use web site mode,
and precompiled mode you can deploy page single page change (fixed
names) or just all dlls.

unlike asp 1.1, the page dll can be precompiled in 2.0. in web site mode
this will include the codebehind. if you use web application projects
there will be an additional dll for the codebehind dll along with all
the page dll's.

just like 1.1, deploying new dlls may cause a recycle (losing inprcc
sessions) if the memory limit, or recompile limit is hit.

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)

> I am currently using VS 2003 ASP.NET 1.1
> I like the way that deployment of a new assembly is so simple, I just
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Any help from people with real world experience in this area much
> appreciated.
Venton - 16 Jul 2007 19:41 GMT
Thanks people.
Using SP1 with web application model gave me the dll's like I wanted -
just like 1.1

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.