I haven't upgraded from ASP.NET 1.1 to ASP,NET 2.0. If I do will my
ASP.NET 1.1 code need to be revised?
Thanks in advance,
RABMissouri2007
Michael Nemtsev - 13 Jun 2007 14:05 GMT
Hello RAB,
Yep. There are too much significant differences between 1.1 and 2.0 to avoid
smooth converting.
---
WBR, Michael Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP].
My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
R> I haven't upgraded from ASP.NET 1.1 to ASP,NET 2.0. If I do will my
R> ASP.NET 1.1 code need to be revised?
R>
R> Thanks in advance,
R> RABMissouri2007
Mike - 13 Jun 2007 16:18 GMT
RAB,
It depends. I converted 1.1 apps to 2.0 without any code be revised and I
converted some where a few lines of code were revised. If anything I get
more 'squiggly' lines under some syntax in my code then anything just
advising me that what I am using from 1.1 may be outdated and to use the 2.0
version. But overall I haven't come across a chunk of code getting revised
from a coversion from 1.1 to 2.0 and so far I've converted around 15 apps or
so from 1.1 to 2.0.
>I haven't upgraded from ASP.NET 1.1 to ASP,NET 2.0. If I do will my
> ASP.NET 1.1 code need to be revised?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> RABMissouri2007
Kevin Spencer - 14 Jun 2007 12:02 GMT
Maybe, maybe not. But it is most likely that it *should* be revised. 2.0 has
a good many more capabilities that you should leverage.

Signature
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Printing Components, Email Components,
FTP Client Classes, Enhanced Data Controls, much more.
DSI PrintManager, Miradyne Component Libraries:
http://www.miradyne.net
>I haven't upgraded from ASP.NET 1.1 to ASP,NET 2.0. If I do will my
> ASP.NET 1.1 code need to be revised?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> RABMissouri2007