 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / ASP.NET / General / June 2007Framework 1.1 and 2.0 on same site
We have one web application created in VS 2003 / Framework 1.1. We need to add one more page to the site. Is it possible to create a new page with VS 2005 / Framework 2.0 and somehow add it to the existing site, and still have it work? And if yes, how so? Regards /Snedker  Signaturehttp://www.dbconsult.dk http://www.vinthervej2.dk [private] > We have one web application created in VS 2003 / Framework 1.1. > > We need to add one more page to the site. Is it possible to create a > new page with VS 2005 / Framework 2.0 and somehow add it to the > existing site, and still have it work? And if yes, how so? Whereas you can have multiple versions of the Framework on a webserver, each site or virtual directory can only use one version - you specify the version in IIS. VS.NET 2005 cannot produce v1.x assemblies natively, though there is an add-on from Microsoft (MSBee) which will do this: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e0d0776f-25c4-444a-a6b9 -71d06826f5b4&displaylang=en Signaturehttp://www.markrae.net how big is your site? If time isn't a factor convert the entire site to 2.0. Why have 1 page in 2.0 and the other pages running .NET 1.1 what I have done in this scenario was run the old site under .NET 1.1, and I created a new site under 2.0 and we would slowly migrate the site to 2.0 so half of the site would run under 1.1 and the other half under 2.0 while the migration was happening. > We have one web application created in VS 2003 / Framework 1.1. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Regards /Snedker And, that is the only way you can truly do it. Most 1.1 sites will succesfully convert to 2.0 without any problem, however, so why go through the circus hoops when it is not needed. SignatureGregory A. Beamer MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com Co-author: Microsoft Expression Web Bible (upcoming) ************************************************ Think outside the box! ************************************************ > how big is your site? If time isn't a factor convert the entire site to > 2.0. Why have 1 page in 2.0 and the other pages running .NET 1.1 [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> >> Regards /Snedker Most 1.1 sites will succesfully convert to 2.0 without any problem, however, so why go through the circus hoops when it is not needed. - this is true but I've taken on projects where the .NET 1.1 web apps were still written like ASP but with an aspx extension so I had to a true re-write of the application. No kidding, I started one project to do some .NET 1.1 to 2.0 migration and the entire 1.1 app was written in ASP. All the developer did was a copy and paiste from him asp web site into a .NET project and gave the pages an aspx extension. There was no code behind, the code had nothing to do with .NET at all. So when I took it over I was pretty much starting from scratch. I've seen many a projects like that. It seems like some developers aren't taken the time to learn .NET, and they just want to create something in the .NET IDE. Why create an ASP app in the .NET IDE or even use the .NET resources to run the app? Makes no sense to me. > And, that is the only way you can truly do it. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >>> >>> Regards /Snedker > Most 1.1 sites will succesfully convert to 2.0 without any problem, > however, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > create something in the .NET IDE. Why create an ASP app in the .NET IDE or > even use the .NET resources to run the app? Makes no sense to me. I've been tasked with similar upgrades - all that it means in the long run is that price goes up... :-) Signaturehttp://www.markrae.net I've been tasked with similar upgrades - all that it means in the long run > is that price goes up... :-) yes it does. WAY UP! :) >> Most 1.1 sites will succesfully convert to 2.0 without any problem, >> however, [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I've been tasked with similar upgrades - all that it means in the long run > is that price goes up... :-) > I've been tasked with similar upgrades - all that it means in the long run >> is that price goes up... :-) > yes it does. WAY UP! :) You know the mantra: "Wheresoever shall two or more contractors be gathered together in one place, yea verily shall they smile sweetly and raise the invoice..." Here endeth the lesson. Amen. Signaturehttp://www.markrae.net LMAO! >> I've been tasked with similar upgrades - all that it means in the long >> run [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Amen. Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.