It's a good practice. It takes control from famously buggy Design View to
your hands. Many avoid using html view for simple reason of not
understanding how an aspx page builds and works.
Eliyahu
> It's a good practice. It takes control from famously buggy Design View to
> your hands.
Most bugs will go away in VS.net 2005. Try the recent beta, you will like
it.
> Many avoid using html view for simple reason of not understanding how an
> aspx page builds and works.
Very wrong perception! Separation of "codes" are main purpose of .NetFW.
Reasons:
1. Ability to derive cleaner codes.
2. Ability to separation duty between web designer and programmer.
3. Security: No business logic exposed to aspx or html part. This last one
is very important. Hide codes from hackers. This does not mean that your
system is absolutely, however, by hiding system logic, it makes hackers to
work harder.
BTW: What an obscure and convoluted HTML is !
John
Eliyahu Goldin - 24 Jul 2005 10:53 GMT
> Most bugs will go away in VS.net 2005. Try the recent beta, you will like
> it.
How does it help those who use VS 2003?
> > Many avoid using html view for simple reason of not understanding how an
> > aspx page builds and works.
>
> Very wrong perception! Separation of "codes" are main purpose of .NetFW.
The question is not where to keep the code. The question is where to set the
properties. If you don't set event properties in the html, *you* don't set
them in the code-behind either. Design View is the one who does it.
According to your logic you should've suggested setting the properies in the
code by the programmer. BTW, I have absolutely nothing against this. What I
don't like in the Design View.
Eliyahu
Brock Allen - 24 Jul 2005 17:12 GMT
>> Most bugs will go away in VS.net 2005. Try the recent beta, you will
>> like it.
>>
> How does it help those who use VS 2003?
It give you hope? :)
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen