
Signature
Neal Rogers
University of Cape Town
Why would you want to support an archaic browser
which is used by .3 % ( 30/1000 ) of clients ?
In any case, filtering for its presence would allow you to
set the browser capabilities to "downlevel", i.e., HTML 3.2,
and a host of other differences.
See :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vbcon/html/vbco
nwebformscontrolsbrowsercapabilities.asp
for a list of render differences between downlevel and uplevel browsers.
Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> But ..4.8 etc ..
> TIA
Neal - 18 Jul 2005 13:20 GMT
Hi
Thanks,
I have implemented the Browser Caps code as per slingshot5 into the web.config
this I will do as well... or just give them a redirect to an info "Use IE
5.0 or better" page'
To answer your question.......
Probably because 90% of those "users" of this archaic browser all reside and
work at our university, and Netscape 4.75 is the default provided here.
(I (only) am really an experimental case for them ..iro DotNet)
MS is not really their shop of choice.
Novell is, ..which resulted in some frustrating times writing a WebService
to interface with NDS as opposed to MS ADS, but eventually got it with both
ADS and NDS ..
Feeling sorry for me Yet ??

Signature
Neal Rogers
University of Cape Town
> Why would you want to support an archaic browser
> which is used by .3 % ( 30/1000 ) of clients ?
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> > But ..4.8 etc ..
> > TIA
Juan T. Llibre - 18 Jul 2005 13:46 GMT
re:
> Feeling sorry for me Yet ??
You don't know how sorry I feel for you... ;-)
You have a lot of resistance to buck against.
Good luck !
btw, the redirect to a "Use IE 5 or better..." page
is only likely to stir up animosity.
I'd, instead, have duplicate files, a main one setup for
the 90% who have the downlevel Netscape 4.75 browsers,
and the other one for the more enlightened ones who use
uplevel browsers.
I know, it's a hassle to maintain, but it's only a one line change :
<@ Page ClientTarget = "downlevel" %>
Then, detecting the 4.75 browser and redirecting
to that page will provide content for them.
You will do much better if you give them content
than if you tell them to climb a tree. ;-)
Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================
> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>> > But ..4.8 etc ..
>> > TIA
Alan Silver - 24 Jul 2005 18:41 GMT
>Why would you want to support an archaic browser which is used by .3 %
>( 30/1000 ) of clients ?
Just in the interests of accuracy, .3% is actually 30/10000 (or 3/1000),
not 30/1000 as you typed.
Love from pedantics anonymous ;-)

Signature
Alan Silver
(anything added below this line is nothing to do with me)
Juan T. Llibre - 24 Jul 2005 18:50 GMT
heh, heh... OK.
My fingers have a mind of their own sometimes... ;-)
Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================
> >Why would you want to support an archaic browser which is used by .3 % ( 30/1000 ) of
> >clients ?
> Just in the interests of accuracy, .3% is actually 30/10000 (or 3/1000), not 30/1000 as
> you typed.
> Love from pedantics anonymous ;-)
> Alan Silver
Alan Silver - 24 Jul 2005 19:10 GMT
>heh, heh... OK.
>
>My fingers have a mind of their own sometimes... ;-)
I sometimes think that mine are about the only part of me that does have
a mind ...
>Juan T. Llibre
>ASP.NET MVP
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> Love from pedantics anonymous ;-)
>> Alan Silver

Signature
Alan Silver
(anything added below this line is nothing to do with me)