I recently upgraded my server to Windows 2003 / IIS 6. Naturally, this
dumped framework 1.1 on the machine. My site no longer works 100% properly.
the first thing I want to do is to ensure that the site, which was compiled
for 1.0, is actually running under 1.0 on the server. How can I control
this?
Thanks,
- Joe Geretz -
Joseph Geretz - 24 Aug 2003 06:22 GMT
OK, I found this. You use aspnet_regiis to set an ASPX application to use a
particular version of the framework. found the solution on:
http://www.3leaf.com/default/articles/ea/SBS.aspx
- Joe Geretz -
> I recently upgraded my server to Windows 2003 / IIS 6. Naturally, this
> dumped framework 1.1 on the machine. My site no longer works 100% properly.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> - Joe Geretz -
Frank Drebin - 25 Aug 2003 16:56 GMT
This is ironic, I actually just happened to stumble across the EXACT answer
you are looking for... even though I disagree with it!! :o)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;820106
> I recently upgraded my server to Windows 2003 / IIS 6. Naturally, this
> dumped framework 1.1 on the machine. My site no longer works 100% properly.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> - Joe Geretz -
Joseph Geretz - 25 Aug 2003 17:32 GMT
Thanks,
That's the solution which was proposed by Jim Blizzard of Microsoft, above.
It's also the solution which was proposed by the article which I referenced
from http://www.3leaf.com/default/articles/ea/SBS.aspx. It seems that I'm
not the only one who sees value in being able to specify the desired
framework in the deployment environment...
(It's also the solution which I used, although this did not correct the
problem. Shifting back to 1.0 was valuable since it allowed me to confirm
that the trouble was NOT caused by the new framework. Instead, the problem
was caused by new security restrictions placed on various critical folders
during the upgrade to Win2K3. See thread titled 'WebServices break after
upgrade to Framework 1.1' in framework.aspnet for more details on the
problem and the ultimate resolution.)
- Joe Geretz -
> This is ironic, I actually just happened to stumble across the EXACT answer
> you are looking for... even though I disagree with it!! :o)
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > - Joe Geretz -