Hi Vincent,

Yes, I have seen it.

Best regards,
Yanhong Huang
Microsoft Online Partner Support

--------------------
!From: "Vincent Cadoret" <vincent.cadoret@specialchem.com>
!Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching
!Subject: Re: Output Control caching : can control be only set through GET/POST parameters ?
!Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:12:03 +0200
!Organization: Guest of France Telecom Oleane's newsreading service
!Lines: 141
!Message-ID: <bf8dgt$5oq$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
!References: <begmhm$gs2$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <FL8WkDETDHA.2344@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl> <bf5p9a$nk5
$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <51QutvQTDHA.1928@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
!NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.234.111.137
!X-Trace: s1.read.news.oleane.net 1058519389 5914 212.234.111.137 (18 Jul 2003 09:09:50 GMT)
!X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net
!NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
!X-Priority: 3
!X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
!X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
!X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
!Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa09.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-
ge.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!oleane.net!oleane!nnrp.oleane.net!not-for-mail
!Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching:1268
!X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching
!
!It's "Output Control caching, code behind and parameters".
!
!Thanks
!
!"Yan-Hong Huang[MSFT]" <yhhuang@online.microsoft.com> a ?crit dans le
!message de news:51QutvQTDHA.1928@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
!> Hello Vincent,
!>
!> Could you tell me the title or link of your new post? So we could work
!with you on that thread. I need this info just to make sure
!> that there is somebody looking into it now. Thanks very much.
!>
!> Best regards,
!> Yanhong Huang
!> Microsoft Online Partner Support
!>
!> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
!> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
!rights.
!>
!> --------------------
!> !From: "Vincent Cadoret" <vincent.cadoret@specialchem.com>
!> !Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching
!> !Subject: Re: Output Control caching : can control be only set through
!GET/POST parameters ?
!> !Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:14:30 +0200
!> !Organization: Guest of France Telecom Oleane's newsreading service
!> !Lines: 77
!> !Message-ID: <bf5p9a$nk5$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
!> !References: <begmhm$gs2$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
!<FL8WkDETDHA.2344@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
!> !NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.234.111.137
!> !X-Trace: s1.read.news.oleane.net 1058433130 24197 212.234.111.137 (17 Jul
!2003 09:12:10 GMT)
!> !X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net
!> !NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:12:10 +0000 (UTC)
!> !X-Priority: 3
!> !X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
!> !X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
!> !X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
!> !Path:
!cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onlin
!e.de!newsfeed.icl.net!
!> newsfeed.fjserv.net!oleane.net!oleane!nnrp.oleane.net!not-for-mail
!> !Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
!microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching:1264
!> !X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching
!> !
!> !Thank you Yanhong, yes, I'm still in this issue, but I just post a new
!> !subject which is more general.
!> !
!> !Regards
!> !
!> !
!> !"Yan-Hong Huang[MSFT]" <yhhuang@online.microsoft.com> a ?crit dans le
!> !message de news:FL8WkDETDHA.2344@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
!> !> Hello Vincent,
!> !>
!> !> I just checked the group and found that this issue is inactive for some
!> !days. Could you please post here if you are still
!> !> monitoring the issue? If so, I will look into it. Thanks very much.
!> !>
!> !> Best regards,
!> !> Yanhong Huang
!> !> Microsoft Online Partner Support
!> !>
!> !> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
!> !> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
!> !rights.
!> !>
!> !> --------------------
!> !> !From: "Vincent Cadoret" <vincent.cadoret@specialchem.com>
!> !> !Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching
!> !> !Subject: Output Control caching : can control be only set through
!> !GET/POST parameters ?
!> !> !Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:18:56 +0200
!> !> !Organization: Guest of France Telecom Oleane's newsreading service
!> !> !Lines: 15
!> !> !Message-ID: <begmhm$gs2$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
!> !> !NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.234.111.137
!> !> !X-Trace: s1.read.news.oleane.net 1057742198 17282 212.234.111.137 (9
!Jul
!> !2003 09:16:38 GMT)
!> !> !X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net
!> !> !NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 09:16:38 +0000 (UTC)
!> !> !X-Priority: 3
!> !> !X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
!> !> !X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
!> !> !X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
!> !> !Path:
!>
!!cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
!n
!> !e.de!diablo.theplanet.net!
!> !>
!>
!!mephistopheles.news.clara.net!news.clara.net!oleane.net!oleane!nnrp.oleane.
!n
!> !et!not-for-mail
!> !> !Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
!> !microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching:1240
!> !> !X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching
!> !> !
!> !> !I have a page which includes a user control. The output of this
!control
!> !is
!> !> !defined by an ID which is set through an accessor in the code-behind
!of
!> !my
!> !> !page. I want to cache this control according to this ID. The problem
!is
!> !that
!> !> !when I place an OutputCache directive in the control .ascx, I got an
!> !error
!> !> !the second type I call the page in the code-behind when I try to set
!the
!> !ID
!> !> !of the control through the accessor saying that there is no oinstance
!of
!> !my
!> !> !control.
!> !> !
!> !> !One solution of this pb is to pass the parameter to my control with a
!Get
!> !or
!> !> !Post parameter and use a VaryByParam="ID" attribute. Is there another
!> !> !possibility ? I set a lot of my controls using accessors.
!> !> !
!> !> !Thanks.
!> !> !
!> !> !
!> !> !
!> !>
!> !>
!> !
!> !
!> !
!>
!>
!
!
!